View Single Post
  #19  
Unread 10-13-2014, 10:38 PM
NOBLE
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,104
Mentioned: 3632 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obey View Post
Me and Erupt have no beef, I'm calling a spade a spade. It was brought to my attention that people KNEW, including Mods and Admins and it WASN'T BEING TALKED ABOUT. Meaning, I had no clue you guys mentioned it at all which is why I said ''fair enough'' when Illo explained they have. Another point I was making is that it seems to occur that there's some type of thread when people have speculations, so why not now? If it was someone of less credibility it would've been. Only Erupt knows if he truly bit or not, I'm leaning with it was probably a coincidence but idk, shit's close.
See...that's what I'm talking about. You found out that staff knew about the accusation and you jumped to the conclusion that they didn't discuss it until you were personally told by ILLoKWENT that we did discuss it? You also seem to have jumped to the conclusion that we didn't make a huge announcement about it or that no punitive measures were taken because of Erupt's status and that if it had been someone lesser known, we would have concluded differently? When was the last time you've ever heard a staff member discussing publicly the possibility that someone may have bitten while that accusation was still being considered and they weren't sure? That would be reckless. Usually when threads like that are made, it's by a regular member...not a staff member. There's no point in throwing shade saying Erupt or whoever may have bitten unless we've concluded that they have bitten and are about to hand out an infraction. And trust me, there's no such thing as "status" when it comes to someone breaking the rules of LetsBeef. Anyone can be banned or stripped of their title. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But I just don't understand why all the assumptions about staff simply because you hadn't heard about it till now.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2014, 10:38 PM   #19
 
NOBLE
Hall Of Famer
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,104
Mentioned: 3632 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obey View Post
Me and Erupt have no beef, I'm calling a spade a spade. It was brought to my attention that people KNEW, including Mods and Admins and it WASN'T BEING TALKED ABOUT. Meaning, I had no clue you guys mentioned it at all which is why I said ''fair enough'' when Illo explained they have. Another point I was making is that it seems to occur that there's some type of thread when people have speculations, so why not now? If it was someone of less credibility it would've been. Only Erupt knows if he truly bit or not, I'm leaning with it was probably a coincidence but idk, shit's close.
See...that's what I'm talking about. You found out that staff knew about the accusation and you jumped to the conclusion that they didn't discuss it until you were personally told by ILLoKWENT that we did discuss it? You also seem to have jumped to the conclusion that we didn't make a huge announcement about it or that no punitive measures were taken because of Erupt's status and that if it had been someone lesser known, we would have concluded differently? When was the last time you've ever heard a staff member discussing publicly the possibility that someone may have bitten while that accusation was still being considered and they weren't sure? That would be reckless. Usually when threads like that are made, it's by a regular member...not a staff member. There's no point in throwing shade saying Erupt or whoever may have bitten unless we've concluded that they have bitten and are about to hand out an infraction. And trust me, there's no such thing as "status" when it comes to someone breaking the rules of LetsBeef. Anyone can be banned or stripped of their title. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But I just don't understand why all the assumptions about staff simply because you hadn't heard about it till now.
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote