Thread: Titles...
View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 07-23-2014, 04:12 PM
J u s T C J u s T C is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,812
Mentioned: 1535 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Default Titles...

This is NOBLES Thread. Shit got fucked up Just run with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE View Post
There seems to be two different mentalities here when it comes to titles and I'm just trying to see which is the more popular one.

ARGUMENT #1: There are too many titles floating around. Titles are one of the main incentives for people trying to win tourneys. When you have so many titles to the point where everyone seems to have one, it reduces the value of having one. Also, having so many tournaments where someone can earn a title means people end up not taking the tournament as seriously as they otherwise might have. If they miss it or no-show it, they'll just tell themselves "well, I'll get an opportunity to win another title next week."

ARGUMENT #2: We can never have too many titles or too many tournaments that offer titles. That's almost the only thing still keeping this place afloat because of the activity it sparks. More tournaments which offer titles also means more chances and opportunities for people to win something and that's a good thing.

I hope I represented the gist of both arguments equally well. Where do you stand in regards to this? Vote on the poll.
Catch 22.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody View Post

I'm part German myself.

Fuck off, I got work to do.

Last edited by J u s T C; 07-23-2014 at 04:33 PM.
Unread 07-23-2014, 04:12 PM   #1
 
J u s T C J u s T C is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.91/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.88/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Voted: 46 audio / 30 text
Posts: 6,812
Mentioned: 1535 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)


Default Titles...

This is NOBLES Thread. Shit got fucked up Just run with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBLE View Post
There seems to be two different mentalities here when it comes to titles and I'm just trying to see which is the more popular one.

ARGUMENT #1: There are too many titles floating around. Titles are one of the main incentives for people trying to win tourneys. When you have so many titles to the point where everyone seems to have one, it reduces the value of having one. Also, having so many tournaments where someone can earn a title means people end up not taking the tournament as seriously as they otherwise might have. If they miss it or no-show it, they'll just tell themselves "well, I'll get an opportunity to win another title next week."

ARGUMENT #2: We can never have too many titles or too many tournaments that offer titles. That's almost the only thing still keeping this place afloat because of the activity it sparks. More tournaments which offer titles also means more chances and opportunities for people to win something and that's a good thing.

I hope I represented the gist of both arguments equally well. Where do you stand in regards to this? Vote on the poll.
Catch 22.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody View Post

I'm part German myself.

Fuck off, I got work to do.

Last edited by J u s T C; 07-23-2014 at 04:33 PM.
Offline