Quote:
Originally Posted by Row
in "Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology" , He commented on the origin of the eye, saying that "to suppose that the eye....... could have been formed by evolution, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree". <--- shows that he believes that the misguided element of chance being thought as the driving force of evolution could not have brought all these parts together at the right time to make such elaborate mechanisms of life (eyes, brain, so forth)
he didnt need a religious nutjob to say such a quote
---------- Post added at 12:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:58 AM ----------
furthermore Robert Jastrow, acknowledging the complexity of the eye said "The eye appears to have been designed; no designer of telescopes could have done it better".
---------- Post added at 12:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 PM ----------
all complex shit in the earth was made my a designer
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Row
Sorry if what i know is perplexing to you.
|
How anyone can believe in a creator in light of the mass of evidence to the contrary it pretty perplexing I will admit. What's hilarious to me is you say that evolution cannot explain the eye (which it can) but let's pretend it can't.... Is that all you really have? You pick that out of evolution. Have you ever read religious scriptures there is SOOOOOO much wrong, it's become a comedy. Talking of comedy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oH0ReL3Cew