View Single Post
  #11  
Unread 06-24-2014, 07:11 PM
TerraByte TerraByte is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Basic Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
3 Won / 2 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
17 Won / 7 Lost
Default

Row, that's simply not all that true any more. There are very little holes in most evolutionary chains, and the sheer amount of transitional fossils are just ridiculous, particularly when it comes to humans. Don't get me wrong, there are still SOME holes, just not all that many.

What would you define as too many holes to be justified as a good answer?
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2014, 07:11 PM   #11
 
TerraByte TerraByte is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Basic Member
Estimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 6.83/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
3 Won / 2 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.37/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
17 Won / 7 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2014
Voted: 5 audio / 86 text
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Default

Row, that's simply not all that true any more. There are very little holes in most evolutionary chains, and the sheer amount of transitional fossils are just ridiculous, particularly when it comes to humans. Don't get me wrong, there are still SOME holes, just not all that many.

What would you define as too many holes to be justified as a good answer?
Offline  
Reply With Quote