[Babylon]

Originally Posted by Dean

For somebody supporting the argument that science IS subjective, they would probably claim evolution was influenced by Darwin's atheistic belief. But, like Crysis said, you can test science to make sure it's correct.

Lol Enf...Argument is healthy.

Charles Darwin was a christian, he was studying in the Church of England under Anglican theology to become a Clergyman, actually. He absolutely hated the fact that he found the evidence for evolution because it shook his belief so much, and essentially disproved the existence of the biblical creation accounts. After he founded the basic premises for evolution he became somewhat deistic (believing in a god, but not a specific one) then later moved on to Atheism.

But I'm very sure some science is subjective, it would be absolutely insane of me to state that science is foolproof and absent of ignorance by some. What is unfounded is saying that common laws/scientific principles that have been accepted by millions and tested by tens of thousands are subjective, as if they were they would have been ruled out by the subjectivity fallacy within scientific discoveries.

[Babylon]

Originally Posted by Dean

For somebody supporting the argument that science IS subjective, they would probably claim evolution was influenced by Darwin's atheistic belief. But, like Crysis said, you can test science to make sure it's correct.

Lol Enf...Argument is healthy.

Charles Darwin was a christian, he was studying in the Church of England under Anglican theology to become a Clergyman, actually. He absolutely hated the fact that he found the evidence for evolution because it shook his belief so much, and essentially disproved the existence of the biblical creation accounts. After he founded the basic premises for evolution he became somewhat deistic (believing in a god, but not a specific one) then later moved on to Atheism.

But I'm very sure some science is subjective, it would be absolutely insane of me to state that science is foolproof and absent of ignorance by some. What is unfounded is saying that common laws/scientific principles that have been accepted by millions and tested by tens of thousands are subjective, as if they were they would have been ruled out by the subjectivity fallacy within scientific discoveries.