![]() |
Set-up Battling
There's been a lot of controversy I'm noticing about this site. ''Who's sending'' seems to be one of the biggest ones around. Why not implement a way to battle regularly in a tournament format? Basically, both post and whatever the date's set-for the battle's revealed. And if one fails to meet the deadline, the other receives a W or.. the other receives points or infractions, if they build-up to a certain point they are punished. Idk, I just feel this would solve a lot of BS.
|
The whole who sending first thing is just an excuse for them not really wanting to battle but just talk smack infront of everyone they can do blind drops on the spot... simple
|
Quote:
|
I also had an idea relating to this somewhat, maybe it would work out better if a person can only send a battle to the other if the other is online at the same time. The only thing is, though, if the person still doesn't respond, the battle still sits (so they won't have to worry about their bars gettin took) they just can't respond to it after it has reached a certain deadline. Yeah, they should have deadline periods. I have no idea if that's a possible thing to do, but this would keep battles from not getting slept on.
|
Sending/receiving is just stupid to begin with. Why wouldn't every battle just be a blind? The receiver gets 3 days to study the other's bar and top them lol. To me, that seems unfair anyway you put it.
|
True.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's what I'm saying, they should have deadlines, and in order for a person to send to the other, the other has to be online at the same time.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.