Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums

Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Talk (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   Should we make LB an 18+ website? (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165356)

Rant 12-05-2018 02:19 PM

Should we make LB an 18+ website?
 
As I'm sure the rest of you have, as well, I've recently noticed an upswing in the younger demographic. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, as it denotes the popularity of battle rap with a younger audience.


BUT....


A lot of us post unsavory material for these younger age groups, that we(per the site guidelines) are responsible for individually. E.G. Supsie often posts pornographic content. We all curse heavily, and discuss other rather adult themes unsuitable for children. Obscene violence, derogatory remarks such as slurs, etc etc.

Plus, battle rap events, at large, are 18+ generally for not only these reasons, but, because of their locations(often taking place in bars, or clubs). I think it's important that we, as a site, take similar steps. As to avoid any unnecessary problems by allotting younger users on the site.


Now, I realize that there are parental and explicit warnings on the site already. But, personally, I think we should include an age verification mechanism on the site(having to fill out your birth date, for example.) And before you say it, yes, people will lie about their age. But, despite that, I think we should AT THE VERY LEAST make some attempt at deterrence to exposing these younger age groups to this type of content.


Similarly, these steps help to avoid potential predatory actions. As, there have been people on the site who show some degree of potential predatory behavior, in regard to child abuse(2 Gucci, Rohaan as examples.). These types of people should not be allowed a group of younger children from which to select.


What do YOU think?

Discuss. :high:
@NOBLE @Seul @Student @Aggo @HVK

Bape 12-05-2018 02:25 PM

Shiiit, I joined this site age 16 and nothing I came across was really new to me or disturbing. I can't speak on everyone but through personal experience I'd have to say no

Barzooka 12-05-2018 02:30 PM

> Calls me a child predator.

> I actually babysit kids all the time.

https://i.imgur.com/KsKC7zI.jpg

You shouldn't be making fun of people for praying on children when you look like your age preference is within the 13 - 16 range.

Let me ask you this, when was the last time you went outside?

Rant 12-05-2018 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bape (Post 1161416)
Shiiit, I joined this site age 16 and nothing I came across was really new to me or disturbing. I can't speak on everyone but through personal experience I'd have to say no

Whether you're disturbed by it, or not is beside the point here, though. Take Supsie as an example, again. If minors see the pornographic material he posts, he could potentially be in legal trouble over this type of situation. It's as much about protecting the adult userbase as it is the child userbase. @Bape

Bape 12-05-2018 02:37 PM

People of younger age shouldn't be stripped of coming onto our site just because 2Gucci is a proven paedophile.

---------- Post added at 07:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:35 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161418)
Whether you're disturbed by it, or not is beside the point here, though. Take Supsie as an example, again. If minors see the pornographic material he posts, he could potentially be in legal trouble over this type of situation. It's as much about protecting the adult userbase as it is the child userbase. @Bape

Good point and I can see where you are coming from but Supsie is a grown man, he is completely responsible for his actions and should fend for himself

Rant 12-05-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2 Gucci (Post 1161417)
> Calls me a child predator.

> I actually babysit kids all the time.

Yeah, because a child predator would never choose to babysit children. Not like that provides ease of access, or anything. And that most child molesters are people who have access to their victims through familial, or interpersonal connections.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2 Gucci (Post 1161417)
Let me ask you this, when was the last time you went outside?

When that picture was taken.

Rant 12-05-2018 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bape (Post 1161419)
People of younger age shouldn't be stripped of coming onto our site just because 2Gucci is a proven paedophile.

---------- Post added at 07:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:35 PM ----------



Good point and I can see where you are coming from but Supsie is a grown man, he is completely responsible for his actions and should fend for himself

Okay, but, it's not just Supsie. You could similarly be in a situation like this, without even having to post porn. And sure, we're all responsible for what we post. No doubt. But, that doesn't mean that we should facilitate as a site a younger userbase to be exposed to these types of posts. How many people have you called a faggot, etc? Do you think children should OPENLY, without at least some deterrent be exposed to this type of material? Again, people will lie about their age. Children will sign up regardless. But, should the site be making it so easy for them to do so?

Barzooka 12-05-2018 02:42 PM

Also, if literally anyone else made this post then this would be taken much more seriously at least by me. However, literally EVERYTHING you do is a troll. You don't actually give the slightest fuck if there are kids roaming around this website, you just wanted some sort of excuse to gain my attention since you're just a lonely desperate fuck. I couldn't even take this post seriously even if I wanted to because at this point you're just way too easy to predict and I can tell you EXACTLY what you would say no matter how I responded.

> 2 Gucci Votes Yes
"Ah, so you think that it would be best to keep all the children away from you on this website?"

> 2 Gucci Votes No
"Oh? So you want to keep all the children on this website so you can talk to them all?"

> 2 Gucci Votes Undecided
"Are you just not sure whether you want to continue talking to children or not?"

So this is where I will shut you down like I always shut you down when you start your shit.

Literally any decent human being with common sense would go and report someone who they truly believe is truly preying on small children.

So far you have not done a single fucking thing except for JOKE about it. So that means only one of two things.

1. You're just a troll who lives under a bridge looking for a snack. This would be more believable since you ALWAYS troll and you're just a pathological liar. I can't even emphasize with you without you being a complete asshole or a troll (trust me, I've tried).

2. You're a scumbag human being and it is YOU who shouldn't be around children if you TRULY believed I was preying on children yet letting it remain unreported. I have given you more than enough information to actually do it and I would LOVE to have you put in the monkey house for false accusation charges if you actually did report me.

Let's get it. P-U-S-S-Y

Barzooka 12-05-2018 02:46 PM

Yes, emphasize as empathy is something that I am completely capable of. Test me.

Ginge 12-05-2018 02:47 PM

All shit aside, I don't think the site should have to make allowances to protect young people from the behaviour on par with the culture of battle rap. If they want to surround themselves with that kind of material online, it's as easy as ever, no porn websites or anything ask for age confirmation etc. Plus if they're familiar with the culture, they'll know what to expect, and if they do find themselves traumatised, they'll know to steer well clear. In the words of some wise cunts, this is battle rap bitch.

Bape 12-05-2018 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161423)
Okay, but, it's not just Supsie. You could similarly be in a situation like this, without even having to post porn. And sure, we're all responsible for what we post. No doubt. But, that doesn't mean that we should facilitate as a site a younger userbase to be exposed to these types of posts. How many people have you called a faggot, etc? Do you think children should OPENLY, without at least some deterrent be exposed to this type of material? Again, people will lie about their age. Children will sign up regardless. But, should the site be making it so easy for them to do so?

We should not have to cut a section of our demographic due to a few bad eggs. LB has block buttons this stops you from having to even see something someone puts in the forum. The only time we should have to step in is when dealing with a predator like Gucci, someone being called a faggot or porn being posted isn't a huge issue in my opinion.

Rant 12-05-2018 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2 Gucci (Post 1161424)
Also, if literally anyone else made this post then this would be taken much more seriously at least by me. However, literally EVERYTHING you do is a troll. You don't actually give the slightest fuck if there are kids roaming around this website, you just wanted some sort of excuse to gain my attention since you're just a lonely desperate fuck. I couldn't even take this post seriously even if I wanted to because at this point you're just way too easy to predict and I can tell you EXACTLY what you would say no matter how I responded.

> 2 Gucci Votes Yes
"Ah, so you think that it would be best to keep all the children away from you on this website?"

> 2 Gucci Votes No
"Oh? So you want to keep all the children on this website so you can talk to them all?"

> 2 Gucci Votes Undecided
"Are you just not sure whether you want to continue talking to children or not?"

So this is where I will shut you down like I always shut you down when you start your shit.

Literally any decent human being with common sense would go and report someone who they truly believe is truly preying on small children.

So far you have not done a single fucking thing except for JOKE about it. So that means only one of two things.

1. You're just a troll who lives under a bridge looking for a snack. This would be more believable since you ALWAYS troll and you're just a pathological liar. I can't even emphasize with you without you being a complete asshole or a troll (trust me, I've tried).

2. You're a scumbag human being and it is YOU who shouldn't be around children if you TRULY believed I was preying on children yet letting it remain unreported. I have given you more than enough information to actually do it and I would LOVE to have you put in the monkey house for false accusation charges if you actually did report me.

Let's get it. P-U-S-S-Y


Rage post harder.

Ginge 12-05-2018 02:50 PM

A better question might be, does the site flag up as adult in households with age protection on their wifi? Cause if not the same kids can look at any shit they want online with no obstacles.

Barzooka 12-05-2018 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161430)
Rage post harder.

.....

I am jealous of you for two reasons. One is how amazingly well you are at trolling, considering how much I wish I could troll as good. The second being how intelligent you are in regard to how well you compose yourself as well as how great of a writer you are.

But you are just an asshole man. I should just do what I said and continue to ignore your bait.

-_-

Rant 12-05-2018 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bape (Post 1161429)
We should not have to cut a section of our demographic due to a few bad eggs. LB has block buttons this stops you from having to even see something someone puts in the forum. The only time we should have to step in is when dealing with a predator like Gucci, someone being called a faggot or porn being posted isn't a huge issue in my opinion.

The term adult content is such for a reason. Because it isn't suitable for children. This is why albums have parental advisories. An age verification is no different than a parental advisory sticker. All you're doing is filling in a birthday. It's just an extra layer of, "Hey, this is ADULT CONTENT." So, even if you don't see porn being posted, or children being exposed to these types of posts as a problem, why not add that small layer of extra deterrence to help to avoid any unnecessary issues that can be avoided by it?

---------- Post added at 02:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:51 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161431)
A better question might be, does the site flag up as adult in households with age protection on their wifi? Cause if not the same kids can look at any shit they want online with no obstacles.

This is actually a really good point. Shouts.

Ginge 12-05-2018 02:52 PM

I mean, what is the official necessary age to be on the site?

Bape 12-05-2018 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161433)
The term adult content is such for a reason. Because it isn't suitable for children. This is why albums have parental advisories. An age verification is no different than a parental advisory sticker. All you're doing is filling in a birthday. It's just an extra layer of, "Hey, this is ADULT CONTENT." So, even if you don't see porn being posted, or children being exposed to these types of posts as a problem, why not add that small layer of extra deterrence to help to avoid any unnecessary issues that can be avoided by it?

You have a point but like we both know it won't really do much besides protect the site if an issue arose, which I can't see ever happening.

Barzooka 12-05-2018 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrant (Post 1161427)
I believe the word you're looking for is empathize.

You know I have a hard time spelling. This isn't the first time you've called me out on my horrible English.

---------- Post added at 02:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:55 PM ----------

Although that being admitted I should probably go read a fucking book sometime huh?

KG The Prince 12-05-2018 03:00 PM

WHAAAT?!

Rant 12-05-2018 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161435)
I mean, what is the official necessary age to be on the site?

The only references to age on the site are the following:

(Per the privacy policy.) Children's Privacy
Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 ("Children").

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your child has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

(Per the homepage.) Some members of the public may use explicit lyrics in the performance of their art, so please be advised that such language, if any, may not be appropriate for minors.


@Ginge

Ginge 12-05-2018 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161441)
The only references to age on the site are the following:

(Per the privacy policy.) Children's Privacy
Our Service does not address anyone under the age of 18 ("Children").

We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from anyone under the age of 18. If you are a parent or guardian and you are aware that your child has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.

(Per the homepage.) Some members of the public may use explicit lyrics in the performance of their art, so please be advised that such language, if any, may not be appropriate for minors.

Honestly, i think thats enough, more than a lot more severely adult sites have in place, and as said, a lot of younger people can be comfortable and thrive in the environment, and are genuinely here to celebrate lyricism, your proposed measures aren't selective over the type of users you're deterring.

---------- Post added at 08:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161442)
Honestly, i think thats enough, more than a lot more severely adult sites have in place, and as said, a lot of younger people can be comfortable and thrive in the environment, and are genuinely here to celebrate lyricism, your proposed measures aren't selective over the type of users you're deterring.

What I mean is, sure you might deter one or two fragile souls who could get triggered by site behaviour, but also some man like KG, some young princes looking to learn and grow as part of the community with their age proving no obstacle.

Rant 12-05-2018 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161442)
Honestly, i think thats enough, more than a lot more severely adult sites have in place, and as said, a lot of younger people can be comfortable and thrive in the environment, and are genuinely here to celebrate lyricism, your proposed measures aren't selective over the type of users you're deterring.

It's prettttty hard to find that privacy policy, and explicit warning, my guy. Even if that were enough(which I don't believe it is.), there's very few, if any who will actually see these warnings. I challenge you to go find this info yourself, and see how difficult it is to stumble onto.

Ginge 12-05-2018 03:07 PM

so what turns up when you sign up then?

Rant 12-05-2018 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161442)
What I mean is, sure you might deter one or two fragile souls who could get triggered by site behaviour, but also some man like KG, some young princes looking to learn and grow as part of the community with their age proving no obstacle.

Okay, to this point, sure, KG's fine and all. But, as previously expressed, this is as much about the protection of the adult userbase as it is the child userbase. It's not only that, either, as this isn't about deterring "fragile souls." It's about deterring minors from adult content, regardless of their fragility.

---------- Post added at 03:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:08 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161446)
so what turns up when you sign up then?

Do you think a thirteen year old is reading a privacy policy, or terms of condition page? Moreover, do you think they're showing it to a parent? This highlights another prime example as to why there should be this deterrence. Maturity. A child will undoubtedly not be mature enough to take these sorts of guidelines into account when making their profile.

EtH 12-05-2018 03:20 PM

If this site was 18+ this thread would have like two posts because anyone with the ability to form a cohesive sentence sees through your absolute bollocks.

Rant 12-05-2018 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tag Team Champion (Post 1161451)
If this site was 18+ this thread would have like two posts because anyone with the ability to form a cohesive sentence sees through your absolute bollocks.

If this site were 18+, this thread would have never been made to have posts in it in the first place.

---------- Post added at 03:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------

Edited OP to potentially get some staff thoughts.

Ginge 12-05-2018 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161447)
Okay, to this point, sure, KG's fine and all. But, as previously expressed, this is as much about the protection of the adult userbase as it is the child userbase. It's not only that, either, as this isn't about deterring "fragile souls." It's about deterring minors from adult content, regardless of their fragility.

---------- Post added at 03:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:08 PM ----------



Do you think a thirteen year old is reading a privacy policy, or terms of condition page? Moreover, do you think they're showing it to a parent? This highlights another prime example as to why there should be this deterrence. Maturity. A child will undoubtedly not be mature enough to take these sorts of guidelines into account when making their profile.

but you expect them to be deterred by being asked for their age?

Rant 12-05-2018 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161455)
but you expect them to be deterred by being asked for their age?

More so than not having literally any deterrence whatsoever, yeah.

Ginge 12-05-2018 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161455)
but you expect them to be deterred by being asked for their age?

plus, you sound like a bit of a pussy in all of this, trying to protect children from adult content online is a losing battle, all these changes will do is leave only the loudmouth arrogant adolescents to slip through to the site. Protecting children from adult content isn't your job, or the site members' job, should fall to parents or the heads of the site. Maybe rather than taking all these eggshell preventative measures, wait for a solitary complaint from a young user or parent to the administration.

Rant 12-05-2018 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161457)
plus, you sound like a bit of a pussy in all of this, trying to protect children from adult content online is a losing battle, all these changes will do is leave only the loudmouth arrogant adolescents to slip through to the site. Protecting children from adult content isn't your job, or the site members' job, should fall to parents or the heads of the site. Maybe rather than taking all these eggshell preventative measures, wait for a solitary complaint from a young user or parent to the administration.

Feel free to refer to the posts where I've expressed that it's not solely about the child userbase.

Ginge 12-05-2018 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161458)
Feel free to refer to the posts where I've expressed that it's not solely about the child userbase.

read the lot of this bollocks mate, but I don't feel a need to moderate my behaviour, and don't feel like underage users are infringing on my enjoyment of the site. Can't empathise with the plight from either side, think it's an oversensitive waste of time in all honesty.

---------- Post added at 09:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:10 PM ----------

@Rant all I can say is, if you were after a reasoned contrary argument, you've got it. If all you wanted was a slew of agreement, tough shit. Don't waste time telling people it's a discussion if all you want is to drag people in to a lecture. I think I've reasonably laid out why I disagree, as much as an autistic mind might not be able to grasp how I can disagree with what you view to be black and white, incontrovertible and crucial arguments in favour of the children. I maintain the amount of effort you're proposing isn't worth the minute effect (the minuteness being something you yourself have admitted to) that the steps will effect.

---------- Post added at 09:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 PM ----------

bak 2 bein da long schlong mamafuckin prince innit

Rant 12-05-2018 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161459)
read the lot of this bollocks mate, but I don't feel a need to moderate my behaviour, and don't feel like underage users are infringing on my enjoyment of the site. Can't empathise with the plight from either side, think it's an oversensitive waste of time in all honesty.

How about from the legal standpoint, in that case? "Sensitivities" aside, there's an underlying potential legal issue with the current standard. With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. Something which has the capacity to shut down the site, something I don't want to see happen. Regardless of whether there's a STRONG risk of this, to me is unimportant, as that potentiality exists. I don't want to see the site shutdown, because of something stupid like a member's age. An age restriction, and subsequent age verification mechanism helps to alleviate this on the basis of legality. As it said in the privacy policy, they do not collect data from children. But, without an age verification system, how is administration to determine who is a child, in order to refrain from data collection from those individuals?

Ginge 12-05-2018 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161463)
How about from the legal standpoint, in that case? "Sensitivities" aside, there's an underlying potential legal issue with the current standard. With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. An age restriction, and subsequent age verification mechanism helps to alleviate this on the basis of legality. As it said in the privacy policy, they do not collect data from children. But, without an age verification system, how is administration to determine who is a child, in order to refrain from data collection from those individuals?

If you're as incontrovertibly correct as you put it across, I suggest you take the issue direct to the moderators and administration. For Rant, if the stakes are as dire as this, and we're in the line of fire of the GDPR, COPPA and URACUNT then the fate of the site falls squarely on your shoulders, for having been the solitary intellect to notice such a gaping flaw in the site's fundamental structure. Go now, and act quickly, the site needs you

---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------

u twat

Rant 12-05-2018 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161464)
If you're as incontrovertibly correct as you put it across, I suggest you take the issue direct to the moderators and administration. For Rant, if the stakes are as dire as this, and we're in the line of fire of the GDPR, COPPA and URACUNT then the fate of the site falls squarely on your shoulders, for having been the solitary intellect to notice such a gaping flaw in the site's fundamental structure. Go now, and act quickly, the site needs you

---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------

u twat

Lol. I'll take an order of "backtracking in the face of factual basis" with a side of "heavy ad hominem."

Ginge 12-05-2018 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161466)
Lol. I'll take an order of "backtracking in the face of factual basis" with a side of "heavy ad hominem."

genuine point, if u so sure u right, dere was no point discussin it, u were just here 4 dickstrokin agreement and adulation, with a side of pointin out what a pathetic needy butch u r ahaha

---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 PM ----------

not a lot of point takin u serious wen u clearly more insecure than intellegent

---------- Post added at 09:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 PM ----------

if u had a basic grasp of my last 2 posts, u'd c more echoing of the same point than backtrackin, both only tried 2 argue dat ur pussio thread is pointless, and u aint botherin 2 do a good job addressin any points ahaha

---------- Post added at 09:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:44 PM ----------

anyway, lost any energy 4 dis autistic shit now, as sed, if u sugh a genius take it 2 da top u daft twat ahahaha

---------- Post added at 09:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant (Post 1161466)
Lol. I'll take an order of "backtracking in the face of factual basis" with a side of "heavy ad hominem."

Just take a final moment to examine the pseudo-intellectual irony of using the phrase 'ad hominem' as part of an act of ad hominem. Daft Cunt.

Edgeworth 12-05-2018 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161464)
If you're as incontrovertibly correct as you put it across, I suggest you take the issue direct to the moderators and administration. For Rant, if the stakes are as dire as this, and we're in the line of fire of the GDPR, COPPA and URACUNT then the fate of the site falls squarely on your shoulders, for having been the solitary intellect to notice such a gaping flaw in the site's fundamental structure. Go now, and act quickly, the site needs you

---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------

u twat

Damn, made Ginge break character.

Ginge 12-05-2018 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edgeworth (Post 1161472)
Damn, made Ginge break character.

stil me, g
was raised in a wank verbose household n use da site 2 let loose ahaha
aint no secret i can spel n shit if i want ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 PM ----------

anyway, no response from da autist im hoppin off ahaha

Row 12-05-2018 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edgeworth (Post 1161472)
Damn, made Ginge break character.

for real, to hell with the topic

Rant 12-05-2018 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161467)
genuine point, if u so sure u right, dere was no point discussin it, u were just here 4 dickstrokin agreement and adulation, with a side of pointin out what a pathetic needy butch u r ahaha

---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 PM ----------

not a lot of point takin u serious wen u clearly more insecure than intellegent

---------- Post added at 09:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 PM ----------

if u had a basic grasp of my last 2 posts, u'd c more echoing of the same point than backtrackin, both only tried 2 argue dat ur pussio thread is pointless, and u aint botherin 2 do a good job addressin any points ahaha

---------- Post added at 09:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:44 PM ----------

anyway, lost any energy 4 dis autistic shit now, as sed, if u sugh a genius take it 2 da top u daft twat ahahaha

---------- Post added at 09:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 PM ----------


Just take a final moment to examine the pseudo-intellectual irony of using the phrase 'ad hominem' as part of an act of ad hominem. Daft Cunt.

You went all 2 Gucci rage post on me, just because you ran out of counterpoints. Lol.

Ginge 12-05-2018 05:09 PM

still aint seen u counterpoint 2 of my posts fam, u pointed an ad hominem finger n continue 2 do practice it u silly twat ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161459)
read the lot of this bollocks mate, but I don't feel a need to moderate my behaviour, and don't feel like underage users are infringing on my enjoyment of the site. Can't empathise with the plight from either side, think it's an oversensitive waste of time in all honesty.

---------- Post added at 09:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:10 PM ----------

@Rant all I can say is, if you were after a reasoned contrary argument, you've got it. If all you wanted was a slew of agreement, tough shit. Don't waste time telling people it's a discussion if all you want is to drag people in to a lecture. I think I've reasonably laid out why I disagree, as much as an autistic mind might not be able to grasp how I can disagree with what you view to be black and white, incontrovertible and crucial arguments in favour of the children. I maintain the amount of effort you're proposing isn't worth the minute effect (the minuteness being something you yourself have admitted to) that the steps will effect.

---------- Post added at 09:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 PM ----------

bak 2 bein da long schlong mamafuckin prince innit

lets hav da counterpoint 4 dis den

---------- Post added at 10:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ginge (Post 1161464)
If you're as incontrovertibly correct as you put it across, I suggest you take the issue direct to the moderators and administration. For Rant, if the stakes are as dire as this, and we're in the line of fire of the GDPR, COPPA and URACUNT then the fate of the site falls squarely on your shoulders, for having been the solitary intellect to notice such a gaping flaw in the site's fundamental structure. Go now, and act quickly, the site needs you

---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------

u twat

as well as addressin da truth in da assertion dat if u so surer da site in danger, y aint u goin str8 2 admin


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.