![]() |
GC Qualification Idea?
I may be absolutely bugging in which case just call me handicap or something idgaf lol. But i have an idea for GC Qualifications that could be used next go around. Instead of picking the top 64 as according to the text records. Have everyone who wants to participate in the GC signup and have a "qualification month" where we set people up with other GC hopefulls then we take the top 32 or 64 (depending on how many sign up) with the best records from that and make that the GC battlers. I think it would help with no shows and also it would make people have in an incentive to use the forums and not just snipe people to get there. Add some competition before the competition per se.
|
You're right
Because I know I'll be in the top 64 but I don't want to battle in the GC. Got college and other stuff going on |
Quote:
|
Some people don't want to hit the forums what so ever, so theyd never sign up. I think a more simple solution would be having people accept / decline like crews. If they decline, it rolls over to the 65th spot etc.
|
^ Much better idea.
|
Quote:
|
Sorry Dys, but eth's gotcha beat
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ethan's idea of adding an accept/decline option, along with the roll-over to 65th, etc, is definitely a good idea. My only objection is that I don't think the site is active enough for that right now and that it's an an idea better suited for when things pick up. For example, there are currently only 45 people ranked in the text arena, which is an improvement from last month which only saw 29 people ranked. I don't even know how X plans to fill a 64-man GC since it seems unlikely that there will be 64 ranked by the end of this month. For the time being, it probably makes more sense to do a top 64 (as much as you can), give a heads up and check-in opportunity to the top rankers in advance, and fill in the rest manually through forum sign-ups if you insist on having 64 combatants. I think we had reduced the GC to 32 at one point when I was still on staff because the activity was so low.
|
Why tag NOBLE in my idea? I couldn't care less what NOBLE thinks about it.
|
Quote:
|
A 32 is probably what its gonna end up being....shii, some folks would have 2-3 accounts qualified if we went with straight numbers. X had mentioned cutting the field to 32 if needed....doing the accept/decline bit there would prolly be a good idea to ensure the most possible active participants.
Side note: Macc is good for business round here....active, shows up when hes supposed to, and cares about the site....keep talkin that shit homie. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.