He had 10 battles but only actually won 7 if I'm not mistaken he got no showed 3 times.

Believe it was 7 actual wins not counting no-shows cause MAN DOWN, Erupt, and someone else no showed during his run of 10.

won 8, no showed 2.

Back then no shows were counted as wins.

Shit, make it 8 then.

So this is all on the statistics page and everyone legit has different answers lmao

here's how.

1. none of us have agreed upon the requirements or standards for the title
2. if we instead vote for who we (individually) believe deserves the title, than everybody gets to weigh in with their own respected sense of what the lbt/lba king standard should be

let me put it like this.

seuls run doesn't impress me, even though i think seul is the best audio battler on the site currently,

rai's run doesn't really impress me, but i feel like rai has put more work into the lbt than anybody else.

these are just some examples, but when i'm voting, i get the freedom to consider all angels and determine an ultimate performer in regards to somebodies battles in the lbt/lba

I told you in the IM lol. I got tired of mfers on here not being able to read my bars properly. So @2FUEL told me to try out audio. It just so happen to be a tournament that was starting so I decided to join. If it wasnt for @2FUEL convincing me to join the tourney, i wouldnt have had any titles.

Shout out to @2FUEL btw. Good shit mang!

Give me a chance to make a poll.

REGARDLESS lol

The one true question: What should the criteria for having the title be.


Most title match wins?

Most consecutive wins?

Longest reign?

I thought u at least had a multi you battled on.

so wait a minute....

YOU MEAN TO TELL ME YOU BEAT ME IN ONLY YOUR 11TH AUDIO BATTLE EVER????

Im deffly coming for you now...