@BLNK What's that answer?

Google it, bro. I'm not your cosmology professor. :S

You haven't proved the act or creating implies an anthropomorphism.

A 6 year old kid could make you look silly saying...

A bird builds a nest
Bees build honeycombs

lol

Is to build to create?


create[ kree-eyt ]LINK0LINK0


verb (used with object)


1. To cause to come into being, as something unique that would not naturally evolve or that is not made by ordinary processes.
2. to evolve from one's own thought or imagination, as a work of art or an invention.

3. to perform (a role) for the first time or in the first production of a play.

Is it not an ordinary process for a bird to build a nest, as it has evolved in such a way that necessitates its building a nest?

The thing is science cant prove everything

Ok the big bang created Earth

what caused the big bang

and what/who created the thing that caused what caused the big bang

Philosophy 101

there is a creator

could it be that creation itself is a force and creation created everything?

Philosophy is rooted in the ability to logically reason, and to prove those rationales. Can you prove that there is a creator?

Are you being petty? lol Is it because I used the word build?

why is it so hard to understand that sometimes....most of the time...shit just happen?

people are nuts and have a bad day and decide to make bad decisions..when questioned about those decisions they remember the most recent thing they were doing so they blame it on GTA V

for months people hear voices in their head so they go shoot up the navy yard...

shit happens, duke...

That's what I'm saying @BLNK

But Philosophy exists because we haven't been able to answer our questions

Think of a fork in the road... philosophy is one option and science is another

but those can lead you to danger...you can rack your brain forever with philosophy and die a confused madman... You can rack your brain forever trying to prove things through science and die a confused madman

therefore you don't pick either route and you go straight to "there's a creator, period"

It is actually the most logical explanation because logic dictates that nothing logical we've tried has yielded the results that can answer all of our existential questions

Or you do what people have done for centuries, and view philosophy, and science as cooperative pursuits.

Side note: Nothing YET. Does that mean that the pursuit should be abandoned in entirety?

---------- Post added at 04:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:00 PM ----------

Nah, I'm schooling you, homie.

BITCH I HATE YOU!!!!! :mad: