Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums

Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Talk (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   Letsbeef Crew Draft 2019 - Preliminary Thoughts (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165762)

EtH 01-17-2019 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RARE FORM (Post 1164842)
Hey hey, 2x Crew of the year. Calm that shit

Its not an insult, youve just not got shit to do. Itd feel weird to even post in a battle repping a crew on LB right now. Ive always been a fan of Anbu (minus Rows faggot ass) but with people so glued to their crews even when the site is completely dead with zero crew action happening, I think we can do better.

Apollyon 01-17-2019 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 1164815)
Then everyone joins those two and no one can vote on anything.

6 crews still seems like too many..

EtH 01-17-2019 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phe (Post 1164845)
6 crews still seems like too many..

I think 4 minimum would be important

Locchart 01-17-2019 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 1164841)



But it's more the other thing right?

I don't see it as that, no.

I understand, at this point, that I'm participating in battles nowadays that are going to get votes on them regardless of who is battling simply because of the stakes involved. Battling high-tier folks doesn't exactly hurt that, either.

Point being: I know my battles are gonna get votes on them, at this point (might sound arrogant to say, but that's just the way things are), so I'd rather put myself in a position to return the favor on all battles that need the votes on them while I'm in the FVC. That way I'm fully able to utilize being in FVC to vote on ALL battles while I can.

EtH 01-17-2019 02:18 PM

I'm sure all 4 active battlers appreciate it.

Locchart 01-17-2019 02:20 PM

That counters the point you were trying to make yourself. Why crew up with such a small amount of battlers present? That makes the voting pool even less than what it is currently.

EtH 01-17-2019 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rieper (Post 1164849)
That counters the point you were trying to make yourself. Why crew up with such a small amount of battlers present? That makes the voting pool even less than what it is currently.

There's plenty of active members. Very few active battlers/voters.

Interaction is everything. Anything that makes people interested in logging onto the site helps massively.

One extra vote on their battles won't do that.

Apollyon 01-17-2019 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 1164846)
I think 4 minimum would be important

I agree with this.. That way we could have more battles and battles can be done in different formats without having to use someone twice.. Its not really taking away too much from voting either since there would be 2 other teams that could vote.. Or if we did have just 2 teams then the max limit of members on a team could be like 10 or 12..

EtH 01-17-2019 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phe (Post 1164851)
I agree with this.. That way we could have more battles and battles can be done in different formats without having to use someone twice.. Its not really taking away too much from voting either since there would be 2 other teams that could vote.. Or if we did have just 2 teams then the max limit of members on a team could be like 10 or 12..

Take yourself. You've not been active or voting in a few months. If you joined this and got interested, boom, another active battler and voter.

There's plenty of active people on here who aren't doing shit like me, and plenty of people like yourself who aren't active for long periods of time. We could both get sucked into doing some shit like this and that'd give two new guys voting on the spot.

Edgeworth 01-17-2019 02:58 PM

Alright open up sign ups and lets see what happens then, any one person agreeing or disagreeing clearly isn’t gonna change anything.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.