^^^ Dawg ya just pickin out tha little things in this argument & youre not lookin at tha big picture.. Do You Even Realize That You're Arguing The Holocaust Was Fabricated and Exaggerated??? You On Some Attention Whore Shit..

1

"And "as a result" and "as a result of"..... doesn't change the definition of the word"
Yes, it certainly does. Those two phrases are fundamentally different.

"You were saying 'therefore' meant something else entirely."

Um... No. What I found particularily funny was that you obviously Googled the definition and still didn't get it right. When I called you on it, you no doubt Googled it again, maybe referring to a different source, and pasted a bunch of extra shit in here with it like pronunciation and synonyms. The list of synonyms, interestingly enough, included "consequently" which was my example in the comment you were responding to. Like I said, I'm sure none of this will make sense to you, and my sureness solidifies with each response from you. So, just for shits and giggles, let's try two sentences using the two phrases as substitutes for "therefore". I'll use the example you provided from your internet dictionary.
I think, as a result, I am.
I think, as a result of, I am.

I'll just let you realize you are wrong on your own, and then respond with more bullshit that doesn't reflect how you truly felt when reading this. It should be mildly entertaining.

---------- Post added at 02:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:25 AM ----------

Like I said, that is precisely why the phrase is redundant. It is the very reason for my challenging you, not a reason why I should not have.

How the fuck are "as a result" and "as a result of" different?

You used two sentences that were

I think, as a result, I am
I think, as a reuslt of, I am

No fucking shit they won't work in that context. That's basic grammar B. Is that really the strongest counter-argument you can come up with to defend how you completely missed the mark on the definition of "therefore" and how I was only 1 word off? LOL

1 word off is better than getting the definition completely wrong.

I think, therefore I am.

I think, as a result of that, I am.
I think, as a result, I am.


You sleep, therefore you snore.

I snore as a result of me sleeping.
I sleep, as a result, I snore.

Your argument is that the sentence "I think, as a result of, I am" doesn't work. No fucking shit, that's basic grammar. lmao.


When you use words in their proper context your dumbass will cease to defend any incredulous (and losing) arguments that you may have. Go to sleep baby girl.

ironic a thread about the holocaust decsend's into grammar nazi'ism.

That's funny because I was smiling to myself during this back and forth thinking Holocaust thread/Grammar nazi.

Just C, OBVIOUSLY Pulse noticed that before you and didn't want to mention it.

I know everything before everybody
I know facts before they become facts
I know what you'll eat today before you eat it

It's the way of the Godbody baby

Pulse lost his virginity before his father.

Seriously? GTFO.

I could explain in more detail why you were wrong in previous posts, and why you are again wrong here, but i's losing its entertainment value. What I think would entertain me one last time is for you to explain how I "got the definition completely wrong." Also, check out the definition of the word "incredulous" before you use it again, because I actually feel like there is a chance, though extremely minute, that you will use it correctly after doing so.