Who cares if he was right?

I didn't care about the un stressed shit as either way. 2 multis or 4. K still didn't use 3. All he did was bring a bunch of irrelevance to the thread.

All I cared was that K didnt use the allocated 3.

And that's all that matters.

I was right.

Say it Vit n we'll go our separate ways.

2 or 4 he didn't use 3. That's all that mattered. That's what I said. I was right. :)

Nah, I'm talking more like... Lets-be-completely-distant.

---------- Post added at 10:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:40 PM ----------

You were right.

*runs for the hills screaming "FREEEEEEEDOM!"*

well fuck the two of you very much.... lol

I mean he came into the thread like

"well TECHnicly he only used tooooo"

Like who gives a shit? He still broke the rules.

He didn't exactly mean that I don't think.

He said the first word and the last word of each multi rhymed: He was explaining that it was impossible to justify it as a 3 syllable scheme when there was nothing but fluff in the middle.

Regardless, I've completely forgotten what it was about specifically now...

Nah he actually said he Technically used 2 not 4. But w.e just clearing it up.

@Just C
@ViTRiOL_
@Itz Killz

^That is exactly what I said, and meant. Not that he "technically used 2 not 4". He used four syllables, two of which rhymed.


Example:
The two syllables in the middle, which are in red, do not rhyme (green = rhyming). It "flowed" in his four-syllable sets, because they weren't emphasized syllables (meaning you don't really pronounce the vowel sounds).. but they did not rhyme, which is why I called it a weak scheme.

I don't care. I been saying this.

He didn't use the set amount of syllables.

Rule broken

DQ

The End.

its actually called not forcing shit tho

^ Verity used you as a punch, haha.