Lol...I actually practice alot. I just dont post audio battles as often, but what really started to piss me off was the voting system in text. Mfer on here be sayin stupid shit lol.

I was half right. 15 votes lol

So glad you don't work in retail.

Haha!

Me too. They dont pay enough :D

Just reading this.

I held that LBA Champion title for 230 days+ or some shit a long those lines, if none of you could come take it off me, then i'm the LBA King. To be honest, I was and should be the ONLY LBA King. RULE got his title by counting his scheme tournament battles as LBA Title defences, so he fast tracked the 230 days+ I put in, by doubling up via Scheme Tourney. I'm not cool with this at all.

To be honest, half the shit I am reading here is disrespectful as fuck, I don't know what you want me to do when I hold onto the title for that long, get wins, some no shows, and don't get the title afterwards, I actually vacated the title after King was appointed so ya'll could have a chance.

---------- Post added at 01:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:41 PM ----------

Also, for an addition.

I did WRITE for those 2 min audio battles that were no-shows, i still put in time and effort into those verses.

Oh well.

230 days ... 5 battles ... 0 audio heavyweights.

I'm not cool with that at all.

lol

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

You ain't an audio heavyweight my friend, but how about you and me battle 2 min audio acapella for the LBA King title?

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

Lol you caught on early huh

Sounds good. You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up for my Bizzy rematch.

Still doesnt solve the ACTUAL issue of what the criteria should be lol

:popcorn:

I don't care what the criteria is, y'all flip-flopping every other day so come up to your own conclusions.

So off my whole post that's the only part you respond to? :confused:

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Illo had 10 consec defences.

I'm not counting no-shows, nor should anyone else.

2 of them were no-shows.

Aren't the titles abolished?

ILLoKWENT
1x LBT Champion
10 Wins (2 Via No Show) - 0 Losses

Battle Record:
Vs Black Book (94%) - Won the LBT Title
Vs Rant (100%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Phroxen (52%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Obey (94%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Dissizit (91%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Erupt (No Show) - Defended LBT Title
Vs ELOH STACKz (81%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs MAN DOWN (No Show) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Rican (83%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs GRizzEAT (76%) - Defended LBT Title


His longest consecutive run was 5

He got 10 in a row. How are you not counting no shows? If you went to a competition and the other opponent or team didnt show up to the venue, do you not win the prize?

No-shows don't change that his run was consecutive and undisputed. I'm not gonna go that far on criteria.

If a boxer trains for a fight but his opponent pulls out did he win?

We can do this all day long.

I dont care if they count or not. Lets just pick a rule and stick to it.

Actually true i feel that.

8 32's in 10 months against probably 5 bonafide heavyweights at that time.

Illo should of always been the standard tbh.

ILLoKWENT has 9 title defenses, yes he has 10 wins total but he had to obtain the title first in order to defend it.


https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122438

You mean 7?

---------- Post added at 01:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 PM ----------


ILLo literally IS the standard, and the whole reason that title exists lol.

Teach that boy something

After losing 3 texts I should have won and had more votes. I said fuck text, mfers about to get this work in audio then. Since mfers cant read apparently

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

Technically live battle rappers still get paid if their opponents a no show

Nope not the equivalant at all.

Knock out tournaments and battle cards are completely different.

If i arrange a battle with DaDDiO and he doesnt reply does that mean i won? of course not.

You WIN battles by WINNING.

You advance in tournaments.

Clear difference.


This argument is all irrelevant anyway.

The only question that matters should be WHAT IS THE CRITERIA TO BE KING?

I was told 7 title match wins. I have 7 title match wins.

If y'all want different i have NO PROBLEM losing the title.

Just make a decision lol

No, it's not. Lol, this is the definition of comparing apples to oranges.

Can you all stop arguing 500 different points and just vote on the poll? Cheers.

While we're on the subject if LBA/LBT King is below or equivalent to a Secondary Championship then why is RULE's title above his GC and Seul's below everything.

Source:
https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128666

Is this the thread i said i wouldnt comment on again? if so i apologise lol

Ive heard this before, the titles arent supposed to be listed in any certain order. Its up to the holder.

They used to have an order though.

@Edgeworth

Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

I didnt lose the title...i barely got that shit

i appreciate the sentiment and i agree with u, i had 32s already written for both mandown and erupt. erupt wouldve been my toughest. its ok tho, i made it up with a 32 line win against Daddio..

---------- Post added at 11:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.