Updated.

Yo I'm trynna get a wild card slot in audio I'll battle someone for it or whatever lmk I'm In here

5 audio battles before dec 31 will qualify you for sure.

i'll add u to the wild card list as well/.

Why not answer my question about why you made a lock biting thread (in the same "Biting accusation thread 3339" style that lock and rican were going back and forth with) when locks battle came before the one you accused him of biting from?

You wont say why. So I will.

I fed rican the false info that lock was biting. I knew rican would turn right around and make a thread about it. What I couldnt have predicted is that you would do it from a multi account of someone who seemingly had no beef with lock. But boom. Literally minutes after I gave rican the info, Hawtlanta had made the accusation. Weird.

And now that Rican is "Self banned" for 2 weeks (which isnt suspect at all) hawtlantas multi is all up in the forums hella active. That's weird too because I've been here for years and have never known swift or hawt to be very active in the forums.

Also strange that you use the same exact ignore and deflect tactics that Rican does in the forums. And that you use the same dismissive "are you okay, buddy" that rican likes to use.

How many times have you written chico and had to go back and correct yourself?

Not fooling anyone chico

Cheato

I got 5 battles ranked #39 so shouldn't need one, right? since its top 64

You're not gonna need one.

Cool, don't enter this GC, thanks :)

I meant you're not gonna need a wild-card lol

LOL @ Sub haha

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

Obvious multi with no battles but up in the forums talking like they know all of LB history. Tried the exact same shit with the GC last year. Isn’t the whole 5 battle requirement to deter people for just coming back for the tournament? What about someone who has 0 battles PERIOD? Lmao? Stupid ass shit man

And Aggos fucking right. RULE I dunno what proof you got that swiftkeys isn’t Rican but if it’s 10 year old audio battles best be re thinking that. Dudes clearly operating that account and it’s not even a doubt

@RULE

Who the hell is Padre? lol

People who post here get added to the list

but thats all it is, a list of people who have asked lol

I know. I mean don't enter this GC so I can win it. lmao

You can beat him Sub

BELIEVE IN YOURSELF

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

Its dumb.

Careful now. People don't like being told the facts, it seems.

@Aggo4Admin!!!

Frankly you can go fuck yourself with this one. staff going out its way to protect cheaters? fuck off.

What good does banning people based on personal opinion do? Lets ask EtH.

Anyone getting demotivated by Rican needs to get thicker skin. What has Rican got away with in the last few months? Got kicked out of the Tag Tourney for an offence that others wouldnt of?

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.


#Agoo4Admin

Lmao, yo. Staff was removed because X said he spoke to his lawyer and he said we all needed contracts if we are considered "staff". Let's get that clear. If there was another reason, provide some proof before dragging our names through the mud. What a complete waste of our time and effort for you motherfuckers to suggest we weren't doing our jobs correctly.

this is not true. how many times do i have to say that X removed staff because of legal threats against the site. and who provoked that? pugz and rant. none of us had anything to do with that.

he said to all previous staff, this is nothing personal, i am only removing staff because i've been legally advised to do so.

Guess thats why you were re-modded then

Wanna show me where the fuck i said your name?

Man you said staff as a whole, I was apart of that. I'm sure you can understand its infuriating when this seems to be the widespread consensus for a reason that is beyond me.

^

This is word for word copy and pasted what i said.

Okay, I'm not here to argue with you. You can agree that, that may lead people to believe the reason the last group was dismissed was due to nefarious reasons.

---------- Post added at 12:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 PM ----------

I know how it feels to be on your end, and staff constantly being attacked. Just want this "last group of mods were corrupt" shit to be dropped.

why don't you ask X? @RULE

the truth is, we were told one thing, so if it's another? we were lied to.

We didn't get removed for nefarious reasons. We got told by X individually that we had to be removed because of him trying to turn LB in to a legitimate business venture of sorts, and that we weren't under any kind of "contract" to be working as Moderators for his business, so we had to be removed.

I was told Guts was the sole reason.

And something with Lock and Boro but i dont understand that situation tbh.

I dont even know who the staff line up was then.


What i DO know is suggesting that im doing a shit job for wanting PROOF is insulting.

Cuz if you day its one of you accused of something you didnt do you will sure as shit want me being the one still running this.

You mean where I deleted his CLEAR hate vote on the battle between Punk vs Muggz where he tries to say "THIS IS NOT A HATE VOTE" in his opening sentence?

I remember BORO running to the forums and crying about it THREATENING to have me demodded over it. Matter of fact, that's what most people truly remember is that BORO felt he was protected and that he had people higher up than me in his back pocket.
@Punk to fact-check.

You don't understand the situation, but I just told you what it was. All good, man.

[/COLOR]i don't think you're doing a shit job, i dont think i've said that, but i do think treating LB as a court of law is retarded. we aren't a police force, with access to the law, and tolls required to find the truth. all we can do is follow the logic and make the ethical choice. in ricans case?

well, sometimes a weed is just a weed and you cut it.

That mindset is a slippery slope.

https://www.letsbeef.com/battle_deta...n=lb&id=679503

Yeah I’m still salty over that. the amount of old heads that voted against me almost got battles themselves.

Boro and I are cool now though.

All I've preached in here was to ban multis, as they are the root cause to everything related to cheating. That's all, please give this some consideration - peace.

i really agree with you. it can lead to witch hunts, and big mistakes. but with rican? there is honestly no way it could be anything else.

The lawyer shit legit makes no sense. Hey look we have mods again. How was the legal training to get the role? Moderators exist on every forum site ever made.

I reckon the whole site turned on Pugz and his decisions and X had to demod everyone rather than just his bro.

But how do you address the situation where Aggo fed Rican some specific information and within minutes Hawtlanta had a thread up about it. Can say we want “concrete proof” but what does that mean? Do we literally need a video recording of Rican logging into Hawtlanta/swiftkeys and writing the posts? Like cmon man. It’s so painfully obvious