Then maybe the wording should be changed too.

LBA/T Legend looks better anyway

Yeah I'd say that'll definitely be the next thread.

Theoretically, if option 1 happened, would you be down to restart from 5 defences and battling Biz next?

To be honest i disagree with that cuz i lost to Biz. So even if i beat him my streak was techincally ended before 7 anyway.

Nah, one king, that's it. Fuck who has a perma title now, there's plenty of shit that's gone down on this site that people aren't ok with. If you can't agree with the standard that the title was created around, you don't deserve it.

The reason I feel thats untair to you and Rai is due to lack of clarity in the rules. So sure, you had incentive to win, but hell Rai might have been like "Wtf would I try hard? Ive already won the King title" you know?

Lmao, it's not fair to ILLo to have all these people running around with his title that didn't do anything close to what he did.

You can't strip someone of a permanent title. Its permanent. Its in the name.

They'd have to all agree and relinquish them.

But, you can though. By simply... stripping them of the title.

"Sir, I'm afraid you're permanently disabled. Unless you try and walk. Then you're probably not".

Permanent has a literal definition. If its not permanent, fuck the title its worthless anyways.

Option 7: Obtain the LBT Legend title after 7 title defenses, no-shows counting.



This means everyone who currently has the LBA/LBT King title would keep their title and battlers like Celsius & Reiper have a chance of winning it without having to completely start over from 0.