Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums

Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Talk (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   Fair Voter's Club. (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134554)

Rant 09-13-2013 08:56 AM

I'm just clowning, fam. Path /is/ a faggot, though.

Hubert Cumberdale 09-13-2013 11:01 AM

@CakedOut, that's not why you have 0 vp.

I got banned for hate voting, I have PMed MSNed and commented for votes, I once voted for myself. Now I have all the power in the world. Fuck the past nigga.

-iNSTiNCT- 09-13-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini (Post 949204)
@CakedOut you clearly didn't read the OP. I am against anyone who has been infracted for their voting being allowed in the FVC. @IV yes, that is the perfect example of this situation, but, not who I was referring to. @Letum would you want a member of the site who was banned for their voting, voting on one of YOUR battles with a raised VP such as that allotted to the FVC? @Row well, you just need to stay on topic. @Vesace LeBron you do, too. @Fidel Z what up, bro? @SMASHH shut the fuck up.


wow ... u really told me didnt u

Rant 09-13-2013 11:14 AM

@EtH this has nothing to do with modship. The FVC' MAIN purpose is to vote on battles. Why should there be any members with prior voting offenses? It makes no sense.

@SMASHH I told you to shut the fuck up.

Hubert Cumberdale 09-13-2013 11:17 AM

I basically came up with the idea of the FVC despite those offences. I've also at multiple times been classed as the best voter on LB (not these days), was in the original FVC, was the only non mod in the secret FVC, was in the current incarnation of the FVC.

But yeah, hate voting UA in 2007 should have cost all of that.

-iNSTiNCT- 09-13-2013 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini (Post 949225)
@EtH this has nothing to do with modship. The FVC' MAIN purpose is to vote on battles. Why should there be any members with prior voting offenses? It makes no sense.

@SMASHH I told you to shut the fuck up.

ouch, there u go again.

Rant 09-13-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 949226)
I basically came up with the idea of the FVC despite those offences. I've also at multiple times been classed as the best voter on LB (not these days), was in the original FVC, was the only non mod in the secret FVC, was in the current incarnation of the FVC.

But yeah, hate voting UA in 2007 should have cost all of that.

So, anyone, despite a history of poor voting should be allowed within a group whose primary focus on the site is exceptional, and fair voting? Yeah, makes sense. Side note, I was also in the original FVC.

Edit: @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

Hubert Cumberdale 09-13-2013 11:31 AM

There are factors taken into account when someone is being made an FVC member.

To start, you need to have a voting power above a certain amount. This means that if you got done for bad voting in the past, you'll have to work it back up. Since cakedout and Ohs are still shit voters, their pasts aren't going to be erased and they aren't allowed to be FVC. Once someone has proven their ability as a voter, in being fair and knowing what they're talking about, then they make FVC. FVC only carries 1vp higher than a normal voter, so it's not a big deal.

Rant 09-13-2013 11:37 AM

It is a big deal if you have previously poor voters being trusted not to repeat that.

-iNSTiNCT- 09-13-2013 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini (Post 949230)
So, anyone, despite a history of poor voting should be allowed within a group whose primary focus on the site is exceptional, and fair voting? Yeah, makes sense. Side note, I was also in the original FVC.

Edit: @SMASHH shut the fuck up.


try again, it might work this time ;)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.