Ad my dear boy, i shall address you one final time.

You are a terrible textcee in all aspects, your recent battles solidify this.

Your opinion on the skills of others is as relevant as Lizmans or Mokanes.

In closing: You suck, thats pretty much it.

1/

@RULE, what are your observations?
I can't very well waste the time reading the 32 with Just C, but I think it may hold a clue as to who the killer is.

Tis a mystery to be sure.

actually, nope. nice try.

Ah, but if you'll notice, he clearly took the concept from a mystery novel, which implies that he's amavid reader, though the choice of a mystery novel seems a bit cliche with a murder theme. Presumably he'll be sticking to the order of the nursery rhyme, suggesting that he is a tidy, and neatly kept individual, when not busying himself with work, he often turns to tidying the home, or small house hold activities. The disorganization of the verse itself suggests meticulous planning in method, but completely random in selection of the victim. He likely follows his victim for several days before hand.

Face it rule, not only is my flow better, so are my ideas. I have some shit I'ont think anybody else here could think up.

Hmm i agree with most of this but i think the selection of the victims wasnt a hap-hazard affair.

There is more to this than meets the eye i believe...

This should be fun. How many lines is a red herring?

You can't fucking out-sleuth a fucking british guy. No way, no how.

I always assumed he was going to send 32 lines to all his 'victims'.

Maybe the red herring means otherwise? Who knows what that madman is thinking.