Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums

Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Talk (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   Red/Blue Programming & false flags (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=160756)

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 02:01 PM

We are all slaves. If we have a debt/monetary system we are. Fractional reserve banking system makes it so. When Fdr used us as collateral via Birth certificate bonds he made us debt slaves to the federal reserve.

Babylon 04-16-2017 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo Esco Bars (Post 1124397)
If you studied history and researched the way I have, you would understand. It's like a human trying to explain to his dog why we have to go to work all day.

Nah. If you have a believed stance, and cannot explain it in a way that aligns with reality then that's your issue and your issue alone. That whole dog shit was just your way of scapegoating out of an explanation all while proposing yourself as enlightened.

From your posts here it just sounds to me like you're a narcissist using numerology to justify it. "I'm a master number enlightened and more aware than other numbers"
"my thoughts to yours are like a human to a dog"


You're coming off as a HUGE faggot honestly.

Godbody 04-16-2017 03:18 PM

@Swagga Lee even if SISI is an Arabic name, it's written in English letters, and English letters been subject to gematria/numerology for ages now. The reason SISI being 1919 has relevance is because al-SISI was born 11/19. ISIS is 9191 and Assad was born 9/11. So SISI is the reverse of ISIS and in a sense his birthday is the reverse of 9/11 so it's an extremely obvious and peculiar connection

Keep in mind Bush Sr announced the New World Order on 9/11/91

And we got attacked 9/11/01

After seeing 9 and 11 a hundred times in matters related to the middle east and death/attacks I would think yall would be asking the right questions. BUT you're still stuck on the gematria/numerology shit after I told you and I'm STILL telling you FOR A FACT that it's widely used by secret societies and organizations til this day

I even took an excerpt from an official freemason website which spoke on Kabbalah and admitted it's utilized in freemasonry. Kabbalah goes hand in hand with gematria. This isn't shit you question because I been did all the research and I'm telling you what I know for a FACT not off of speculation.

Again, FACT.

---------- Post added at 03:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:07 PM ----------

By the way if I'm reaching and none of this shit is significant..

Explain how Skull and Bones logo has 322 under it, and the airport bombing in Brussels occurred on 3/22. Skull and Bones is a frat at Yale University and their members are connected to the CIA and end up getting influential positions in politics, judicial system, etc. Bush Sr was the ex-director of the CIA and he was a member. Bush Jr and John Kerry were too. In fact if any of you watch "The Americans" it's creator Joe Weis burg also atended Yale and is ex-CIA.

So, knowing the Skull and Bones connection to the CIA, knowing they pull cretain strings behind the scenes it's no surprise they conducted an attack on 3/22

But there's more. NBA commissioner Adam Silver is also a jew, and he's been rigging the NBA for years. In fact I accurately predicted Westbrook would end up with 42 triple doubles WEEKS ago when he only had 36 and I posted the status on Facebook so fuck a hater and a nonbeliever

Anyway, Cavaliers big 3 members. Kevin Love, Kyrie Irving, LEBRON James. Standing next to each other their jersey numbers are "0" (Love) "2" (Irving), and "23" (LeBron).

Which is 0223 or 322 reversed since the 0 is just a placeholder. Like I can't break shit down any easier for ya'll to understand and I don't blame yall cuz you don't bury your head in books like I do, actively seeking this kind of information. But now you have no excuse

Kabbalists jews been running shit and utilizing gematria/numerology for ages. Adam Silver of the NBA is just another exampLe

Disregard the typos I'm on my phone

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babylon (Post 1124410)
Nah. If you have a believed stance, and cannot explain it in a way that aligns with reality then that's your issue and your issue alone. That whole dog shit was just your way of scapegoating out of an explanation all while proposing yourself as enlightened.

From your posts here it just sounds to me like you're a narcissist using numerology to justify it. "I'm a master number enlightened and more aware than other numbers"
"my thoughts to yours are like a human to a dog"


You're coming off as a HUGE faggot honestly.

I can explain it but it's too lengthy be typing on a thread like this from my phone. And tbh idgaf about how I'm coming off to you

Rant 04-16-2017 03:55 PM

http://bigthink.com/neurobonkers/how...ime=1492094629

Relevant.

NOBLE 04-16-2017 04:10 PM

I typed up a response and it didn't submit cause the page was taking too long to load.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 06:38 PM

Read the Gods of Eden by William Bramley you'll see where I get my information from.

---------- Post added at 05:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:06 PM ----------

Google the Annunaki.

---------- Post added at 05:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:03 PM ----------

A very compelling argument for the idea we were created by ETs.


NOBLE 04-16-2017 07:50 PM

I think you guys don't understand what constitutes knowledge. "A man knows naught by being told. If man must know, man must himself BE what he knows." You can't claim to know something because somebody told you. Talking about books you've read....that's an author telling you something in written form. It doesn't mean you KNOW. It means you've been informed (or misinformed). Knowledge entails the information has been internalized through experience, evidence or reasoning (as per the rules of logic, not faulty reasoning). Reading some author's interpretation of Summerian mythology and the Annunaki towards an ancient astronaut theory might be compelling. But you can't claim to "know" or have evidence of it unless you've actually studied to become fluent in reading and writing cuneiform and you've looked at the actual tablets yourself and thus arrived at the same conclusion. Don't throw words like "knowledge" or "knowing" around carelessly like that.

---------- Post added at 07:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 PM ----------

You're committing what's called "appeal to authority" fallacies. David Wilcock or whoever else you've read may or may not actually know what they're talking about. I don't know what their credentials are, but no matter what they know, reading their books alone won't automatically translate into you having the same "knowledge." I hope you realize this. True knowledge takes more than that.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 07:55 PM

By this definition of knowledge nobody knows the colors because we've all told this is blue or this is red.

---------- Post added at 06:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:52 PM ----------

In addition you "know" because you fact check and cross reference other information from independent sources. Which I do and have done.

NOBLE 04-16-2017 07:59 PM

We know about colors in more ways than being given their appellations. We've experienced them, which is subjective.

---------- Post added at 07:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 PM ----------

If by cross-referencing, you mean simply discovering that other "authorities" said the same thing.....No..that doesn't grant one knowledge.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 08:04 PM

So you're saying everything is subjective and based on the individual experience of said information? Then I guess nobody knows anything. Because everyone who studies anything in school and college is merely told information.

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 PM ----------

If the scientific method is used and proven time and time again is that knowledge?

NOBLE 04-16-2017 08:05 PM

I honestly was like you guys once upon a time. I thought I "knew" a bunch of shit because I had read a bunch of books. I used to spend at least $200 every weekend on books, reading about everything from Madame Blavatski to Rosicrucianism to conspiracy theories. I've probably forgotten more about this shit than both you and Pulse "know" combined. I used to actually teach lectures on "sovereign citizenship" UCC filings and the whole "strawman" stuff you were talking about earlier. Then I had to take a step back and realize...most of the things I thought I "knew"...I really didn't. It was just information derived from other people who for one reason or another I attached authority to. I realized I really didn't know shit and I've learned to be a lot more careful with claims of "knowledge."

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 08:06 PM

If someone touches fire and doesn't feel pain does that mean they know fire doesn't hurt?

Godbody 04-16-2017 08:08 PM

Madame Blavatsky is just 1 name. I doubt you've read 1/3rd of what I forgot. Doubt you know much about O.T.O. or freemasonry. I have books on this shit including books from the highest authorities. I have fucking grimoires (spellbooks),books on numerology, alchemy, astrology, the best texts the public can get their hands on about freemasonry..Doesn't that constitute knowledge? An Albert Pike book about freemasonry, when it's well documented that Albert Pike was one of the highest authorities on freeemasonry during his time?

NOBLE 04-16-2017 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo Esco Bars (Post 1124450)
So you're saying everything is subjective and based on the individual experience of said information? Then I guess nobody knows anything. Because everyone who studies anything in school and college is merely told information.

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 PM ----------

If the scientific method is used and proven time and time again is that knowledge?

No, I'm not saying everything is subjective. I'm saying "knowledge" is arrived at primarily through experience, evidence and reasoning...not what someone tells you. You said we only know about colors because someone told us one is called "red" and another is called "blue" and so forth. I'm saying we KNOW about colors because we've actually seen them (experienced them). What we call "red" would exist even if we didn't have a word for describing it. So our knowledge of it doesn't just come from what it's called which other people told us.

---------- Post added at 08:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:11 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godbody (Post 1124455)
Madame Blavatsky is just 1 name. I doubt you've read 1/3rd of what I forgot. Doubt you know much about O.T.O. or freemasonry. I have books on this shit including books from the highest authorities. I have fucking grimoires (spellbooks),books on numerology, alchemy, astrology, the best texts the public can get their hands on about freemasonry..Doesn't that constitute knowledge? An Albert Pike book about freemasonry, when it's well documented that Albert Pike was one of the highest authorities on freeemasonry during his time?

You're right, I don't "know" about those things, but I am aware. I honestly don't recall anything you've ever mentioned on this site that I wasn't aware of fam...except maybe Lil B.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 08:15 PM

But if nobody told you what the colors were, you wouldn't know how to define them. Third party perspective also plays a factor. You may have never put an engine together but you know you need oil gas fire and air to make an engine move a car.

NOBLE 04-16-2017 08:19 PM

To be honest, my name NOBLE actually came from me being part of a group called the Moorish Science Temple. The founder, Noble Drew Ali, based it off the shriners. After the 33'rd degree, Masons who go into the shrine are known as "Nobles." They wear the fez with an 18" tassle. Both the NOI and the nation of Gods and Earths got their teachings from Moorish Science @Godbody. I was in their "Adept Chamber" so I "know" more about this shit than you might think.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 08:24 PM

If someone can supply enough facts and enough logic and they spent years studying about a particular subject, I'm going to go ahead and say they "know" about that subject. In addition, you dont have to "know" everything about a subject to "know" something.

NOBLE 04-16-2017 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo Esco Bars (Post 1124450)
If the scientific method is used and proven time and time again is that knowledge?

The scientific method is not knowledge. It is a method for arriving at knowledge. A proposition such as "the scientific method works" cannot constitute knowledge unto YOU until it is proven by YOU. If you make such a proposition based on having read about other people who have used the scientific method successfully, its still information to you rather than knowledge. Go do some actual experiment using the scientific method. Then you can claim to "know."

---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godbody (Post 1124455)
I have books on this shit including books from the highest authorities. I have fucking grimoires (spellbooks),books on numerology, alchemy, astrology, the best texts the public can get their hands on about freemasonry..Doesn't that constitute knowledge?

No, it doesn't, unfortunately. If you have spell books, that doesn't constitute knowledge until you're actually performing the spells and find that they work. If you're doing that and claim to know spells, then more power to you. But just having read some books, whether from the "highest authorities" or not, simply means you have some information written on a page. It doesn't mean you have knowledge.

Rant 04-16-2017 09:06 PM

Noble going hard.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 09:15 PM

From the dictionary:
knowl·edge
ˈnäləj/
noun
1.
facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.
"a thirst for knowledge"
synonyms: understanding, comprehension, grasp, command, mastery; More
2.
awareness or familiarity gained by experience of a fact or situation.
"the program had been developed without his knowledge"

Rant 04-16-2017 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo Esco Bars (Post 1124470)
From the dictionary:
knowl·edge
ˈnäləj/
noun
1.
facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.
"a thirst for knowledge"
synonyms: understanding, comprehension, grasp, command, mastery; More
2.
awareness or familiarity gained by experience of a fact or situation.
"the program had been developed without his knowledge"

Through experience. Hmmm.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 09:34 PM

the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. Hmmmmmm.....looks like we're both right

NOBLE 04-16-2017 09:35 PM

There are many definitions for knowledge. The most reliable comes from philosophy in general and epistemology specifically. I read a lot of philosophy and have given a lot of thought to what constitutes knowledge. The best definition, imo, is a "justified and true belief." It's not just a matter of whether what you believe is true, but why do you believe it? You have to be justified in believing it before it constitutes knowledge unto you. Otherwise it is just information.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swagga Lee (Post 1124473)
There are many definitions for knowledge. The most reliable comes from philosophy in general and epistemology specifically. I read a lot of philosophy and have given a lot of thought to what constitutes knowledge. The best definition, imo, is a "justified and true belief." It's not just a matter of whether what you believe is true, but why do you believe it? You have to be justified in believing it before it constitutes knowledge unto you. Otherwise it is just information.

By that definition then knowledge is subjective. It's based on what you can justify. In that case I have knowledge of the Anunaki and the fact that they created humans to mine gold for them

NOBLE 04-16-2017 09:41 PM

...which you justify based on something you read...lol.

---------- Post added at 09:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 PM ----------

Have you read the Enuma Eliesh (Gilgamesh Epics) yourself in the original cuneiform? How do you know the authors saying Enki and Enlil were extraterrestrials are correct then?

Godbody 04-16-2017 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swagga Lee (Post 1124462)
The scientific method is not knowledge. It is a method for arriving at knowledge. A proposition such as "the scientific method works" cannot constitute knowledge unto YOU until it is proven by YOU. If you make such a proposition based on having read about other people who have used the scientific method successfully, its still information to you rather than knowledge. Go do some actual experiment using the scientific method. Then you can claim to "know."

---------- Post added at 09:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------


No, it doesn't, unfortunately. If you have spell books, that doesn't constitute knowledge until you're actually performing the spells and find that they work. If you're doing that and claim to know spells, then more power to you. But just having read some books, whether from the "highest authorities" or not, simply means you have some information written on a page. It doesn't mean you have knowledge.

If niggas know shit and they write it down for others to learn it, it's knowledge. What you're doing is semantics. Literally. "Just because they wrote it down doesn't mean they knew what they were writing and it doesn't mean they wrote down something true bla bla"

Your logic is incredibly flawed and only works under the premise that people purposely write false shit to mislead others. Or that the MAJORITY of written information is false. Which I dont think is true. You're trying too hard to be right when you're wrong.

NOBLE 04-16-2017 09:48 PM

Read the story of Socrates. I think it will illustrate where I'm getting at very well. He famously said "I am the wisest man in the world because I know one thing: that I know nothing at all." He started his journey because someone told him the oracle of Delphi said in all the world, there is none wiser than Socrates. He was confused by this because he knew he didn't really know anything. So he set out to prove the oracle wrong by seeking out people who would know more than him (politicians, magistrates, doctors, etc). The whole point of his story is what we can truly claim as knowledge is a very tiny part of a spectrum. You guys should humble yourselves with all these claims of "knowing", especially "knowing" based on what authors tell you when you haven't done the legwork and experiments yourself.

Godbody 04-16-2017 09:49 PM

By the way back to the original topic of red/blue programming

I'm watching the NBA playoffs Rockets vs Thunder and the Rockets fans have shirts that say "See Red"

NOBLE 04-16-2017 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godbody (Post 1124478)
If niggas know shit and they write it down for others to learn it, it's knowledge. What you're doing is semantics. Literally. "Just because they wrote it down doesn't mean they knew what they were writing and it doesn't mean they wrote down something true bla bla"

Your logic is incredibly flawed and only works under the premise that people purposely write false shit to mislead others. Or that the MAJORITY of written information is false. Which I dont think is true. You're trying too hard to be right when you're wrong.

Naw...you don't see where I'm coming from at all.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 10:00 PM

@Swagga Lee do agree with you but I can only have a knowledge based on the information available. That's all any of us can do. I also agree with @Godbody in the sense that you are really dealing in semantics. Of course we know only what we were told and when new information is presented knowledge changes.

Godbody 04-16-2017 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godbody (Post 1124480)
By the way back to the original topic of red/blue programming

I'm watching the NBA playoffs Rockets vs Thunder and the Rockets fans have shirts that say "See Red"

Quoting myself for accuracy and truth. How much more do you need to see and how much more do I need to make you aware of?

I've been trying to find "SEE RED" shirts on Google so I can find out if this is something they do every year and I'm buggin but of course it's not and I'm right. This is the first time they made these "SEE RED" shirts.

NOBLE 04-16-2017 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo Esco Bars (Post 1124484)
@Swagga Lee do agree with you but I can only have a knowledge based on the information available. That's all any of us can do. I also agree with @Godbody in the sense that you are really dealing in semantics. Of course we know only what we were told and when new information is presented knowledge changes.

Making a distinction between knowledge and information is not mere semantics. When I arrived at my present view of what constitutes knowledge, I had to throw away 99% of the things I thought I knew and un-learn a lot of things. Today, I know very little, if anything at all...but the things I do "know" stand on a much more solid foundation. There's actually a lot of freedom in that (knowing that you know very little). Not saying that knowledge can't be derived from information, but like I said before, the information has to be internalized (through experience, evidence, reasoning). You are your own first reference to reality. Everything you come to be aware of, you become aware of through being you. So the adage that "if man must know, man must himself BE what he knows" holds a lot of weight to me.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 10:19 PM

Well the way I "know" is when I read something (especially in a spiritual sense), it resonates with me deeply. And when I am presented with "facts" that backs up that intuition, I then claim "I know".

Mindless 04-16-2017 10:22 PM

I'm bored with this.

@Rant

Spoderman thread?


Wayco 04-16-2017 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godbody (Post 1124242)
First of all we false flagged the Syria shit...nobody in their right mind would provocate U.S. military action when tensions are at an all time high against Russia and their allies

I don't practice QBL but I appreciate ideas found in it. There's concepts that more or less intertwine all major religions. Some would say there's a thread that runs throughout them. Kabbalist, Sufis, Rosicrucians.. all share integral teachings.

Jews aren't trying to take over the world. They're pawns like the rest of us in most cases. However, due to Christian law, Jews were used throughout the centuries by Christian Nobility. Usually in banking or in government. Because usury is a sin for Christians and Muslims. The reason Jews dominate certain professions now is because of their IQ and racial skill sets. They excel in those fields because learning has always been a core value of their culture. The history of the Jews is pretty much get used and shit on, come up off the system in place, then get kicked out for out thinking the corrupt aristocracy. And I don't think it's a conspiracy for a group to seek prominent positions in society. It's intelligent and always done. Now, a lot of Jewish people do posses great power and do fucked up shit. But that's not cuz all Jews are evil it's cuz power corrupts and the path to power is corruption.

Red and blue can represent duality but so can a lot of things. Men/Women, Young/Old or Dark and light, which is the most common analogy used. Red represents blood/Blue represents the sky. Combine the two and you get purple the color of the god king or "emperor". All colors affect our moods though. Red makes you hungry, aware, and shows youthfulness, it also increases your appetite for something and blue seems refreshing, inviting, trustworthy. Red and blue are the perfect combination for fast foods and such and why you see the combination so often. I do believe in mass programming through television and music.

Numerology is what you make of it. You can have a great life without knowing it ever existed. And you can live a horrible life always checking what your numerologist says. Is it real? Depends on what you mean. With predictions the predictions are written vaguely or in a way most can feel it applies to them in some way. Especially if they really want to find it there. But numbers do have meaning. From their inception every number meant something.. Odd numbers are masculine and even numbers are feminine. 1 is the complete structure, 3 is our understanding of god, 4 the earth and 5 is the son. The 5 levels of elevation. Real numerology isn't fortune telling it's gaining an understanding. There's lots of tricks and secrets in math and Geometry that are cool but what's it matter? Practicality matters most. And practical applications and uses. If no practical uses then who tf cares. The Fibonacci sequence is something very interesting that artists and others make use of though.

Babylon is not the same as Sumer. The Sumerian culture was around first. And a lot of their writings were taken out of context by the guy who wrote Chariots of The Gods. The Sumerian religion was likely invented with a two fold purpose.. 1) as a tool to indoctrinate slaves. And 2) as a closed system of initiation for its elite. With an outer an inner religion. The gods and goddesses of Sumer were stars and planets and their movements were the basis of their theology. With that being said it's highly unlikely they worshipped aliens or were taught by aliens. As their entire plethora of gods were based around a perception of movements given from earths location. With the exception of Planet X. But Sumerians were extremely knowledgeable when it came to astrology and could of recorded a planet rarely seen or computed its possibility by some unknown method.

I think you have good ideas and are on the right path but not the right path.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 10:47 PM

Research Corey Goode. He's a whistleblower. He actually worked in the secret space program and has actually substantiated the ancient alien theory. As well William Tompkins also made the same claims. Tompkins was a navy aerospace engineer and has helped design and has flown every known and unknown aircraft the navy has.

Wayco 04-16-2017 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo Esco Bars (Post 1124494)
Research Corey Goode. He's a whistleblower. He actually worked in the secret space program and has actually substantiated the ancient alien theory. As well William Tompkins also made the same claims. Tompkins was a navy aerospace engineer and has helped design and has flown every known and unknown aircraft the navy has.

Well, I'll site a conspiracy theorist then.. William Cooper, retired navy intel officer and author of Behold A Pale Horse, said there was reverse technology from captured alien craft and aliens. But later retracted this and claimed intel and people privy to top secret projects were often shown bullshit to later confuse and discredit them i.e. Things like being taken to see alien craft and staring at goats.

Godbody 04-16-2017 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lyve SCIENCE (Post 1124490)
I don't practice QBL but I appreciate ideas found in it. There's concepts that more or less intertwine all major religions. Some would say there's a thread that runs throughout them. Kabbalist, Sufis, Rosicrucians.. all share integral teachings.

Jews aren't trying to take over the world. They're pawns like the rest of us in most cases. However, due to Christian law, Jews were used throughout the centuries by Christian Nobility. Usually in banking or in government. Because usury is a sin for Christians and Muslims. The reason Jews dominate certain professions now is because of their IQ and racial skill sets. They excel in those fields because learning has always been a core value of their culture. The history of the Jews is pretty much get used and shit on, come up off the system in place, then get kicked out for out thinking the corrupt aristocracy. And I don't think it's a conspiracy for a group to seek prominent positions in society. It's intelligent and always done. Now, a lot of Jewish people do posses great power and do fucked up shit. But that's not cuz all Jews are evil it's cuz power corrupts and the path to power is corruption.

Red and blue can represent duality but so can a lot of things. Men/Women, Young/Old or Dark and light, which is the most common analogy used. Red represents blood/Blue represents the sky. Combine the two and you get purple the color of the god king or "emperor". All colors affect our moods though. Red makes you hungry, aware, and shows youthfulness, it also increases your appetite for something and blue seems refreshing, inviting, trustworthy. Red and blue are the perfect combination for fast foods and such and why you see the combination so often. I do believe in mass programming through television and music.

Numerology is what you make of it. You can have a great life without knowing it ever existed. And you can live a horrible life always checking what your numerologist says. Is it real? Depends on what you mean. With predictions the predictions are written vaguely or in a way most can feel it applies to them in some way. Especially if they really want to find it there. But numbers do have meaning. From their inception every number meant something.. Odd numbers are masculine and even numbers are feminine. 1 is the complete structure, 3 is our understanding of god, 4 the earth and 5 is the son. The 5 levels of elevation. Real numerology isn't fortune telling it's gaining an understanding. There's lots of tricks and secrets in math and Geometry that are cool but what's it matter? Practicality matters most. And practical applications and uses. If no practical uses then who tf cares. The Fibonacci sequence is something very interesting that artists and others make use of though.

Babylon is not the same as Sumer. The Sumerian culture was around first. And a lot of their writings were taken out of context by the guy who wrote Chariots of The Gods. The Sumerian religion was likely invented with a two fold purpose.. 1) as a tool to indoctrinate slaves. And 2) as a closed system of initiation for its elite. With an outer an inner religion. The gods and goddesses of Sumer were stars and planets and their movements were the basis of their theology. With that being said it's highly unlikely they worshipped aliens or were taught by aliens. As their entire plethora of gods were based around a perception of movements given from earths location. With the exception of Planet X. But Sumerians were extremely knowledgeable when it came to astrology and could of recorded a planet rarely seen or computed its possibility by some unknown method.

I think you have good ideas and are on the right path but not the right path.

I was talking about red/blue programming and the Rockets fans had "SEE RED" shirts on during the game. Your entire post is irrelevant so type essays up all you want it's not helping your case when there's a glaring case of red/blue programming on probably the most watched televised NBA series of the first round in Oklahoma City vs Houston

But it's cute that you know a little bit.

Pablo Esco Bars 04-16-2017 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lyve SCIENCE (Post 1124497)
Well, I'll site a conspiracy theorist then.. William Cooper, retired navy intel officer and author of Behold A Pale Horse, said there was reverse technology from captured alien craft and aliens. But later retracted this and claimed intel and people privy to top secret projects were often shown bullshit to later confuse and discredit them i.e. Things like being taken to see alien craft and staring at goats.

That's where intuition comes in. Trusting in what I feel.

---------- Post added at 10:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 PM ----------

Bunch of fucking Nihilists on LB. Lmao


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.