I would go ahead and say, akin to Crysis's point, that the study of science has always strived to be the most unequivocal and objectively correct medium of research.

Anyone that says that science is too subjective is either an uppity religious grouch trying to poke holes in it or completely uninformed.

Know nothing? They (assuming your referring to scientist) might have a small amount of knowledge in certain areas but nothing? Lol. Naw...Scientist know a lot about the physics that applies on earth/space. Obviously, they haven't made science a perfect/complete form of knowledge, but it can explain a lot of things.

Yea bro^

I think there's a reason Science & Religion naturally butt-heads, I just can't seem to wrap my mind around it yet.

@SuperGuy
"Science works on the frontier between knowledge and ignorance-Not afraid to admit what we don't know. There's no shame in that. The only shame is to pretend that we have all the answers." - Neil deGrasse Tyson

@Crysis hey, you seem to be the closed minded one not me with all your 'Facts' and 'Nothing is real but Logic an hard evidence' (Even tho there is proof if you dig deep enough) and thats fine you can think how ever you like, don't try change my mind into thinking like you tho.

Also I ain't gonna argue with you post after post like you do with other dudes.

"Condemnation without investigation is the hight of ignorance" - Elbert Einstein

You have no clue what you're talking about. I'm in no way closed minded, just because I state my side of the argument on things does not mean I don't tolerate the other side. If you have some proof that you've found from digging deep down stop being retarded and state it, don't randomly comment that the entire institution for our advanced existence knows nothing then act surprised when people call you a moron. It's literally like saying "The entire basis for fundamental mathematics is wrong. 2+2 is actually 17." then calling whoever says you're wrong closed minded.

And I'm not trying to change your mind on shit, you choose how to take in the things people say. I'm simply stating my claims based upon factual evidence that I've found. If you choose to reject basic logical principles that's on you, and not my problem, but if you choose to combat my logical principles with some of your own then we can come to a position in which we've both learned something.

"Ignorance is bliss" - Thomas Gray

@Crysis here is a youtube video you can watch wait till the kid stops rapping and when the dude stars speaking.

Regaurding the poet:

I've never understood this entire "Every bit of institutionalized positions in power are corrupt" position. Not everybody is out to get us, and not every political power is a corrupt bastard. This shit borderlines conspiracy theorists.

Regaurding the speaker:

Basic pseudo-logical principles rejecting the legitimacy in any institution of logical reasoning. He's taking generally subjective abstracts within concepts and molding them towards the premise that logic, reasoning, and rational thought are unfounded / ill formed.

Normality is subjective. His entire argument is structured so poorly that he doesn't see that almost everybody has a difference in opinion within the subjective definition of "Normal". He's also fundamentally wrong on his very first point, our society isn't black and white. Points are not immediately rejected just because they are harder to grasp. These points, if given light to those who have the capabilities, are tested under conditions to prove or disprove their legitimacy unless the point itself violates a widely accepted law that is close to infallible.

Case in point, if you tell me that there's a pink ninja that only you can see following you around with a spectral katana, I'm going to call you insane. If this later proves to be actually true, so what? It was unfounded when it had no evidence. Him saying that the earth was a sphere and it being rejected by those who were under the impression that it was flat bares no significance. We as a collective whole do not know everything, that doesn't mean we should go around assuming pink ninjas follow everyone.

The absence of proof is not proof of anything.

/endrant.

"The absence of evidence, is not the evidence of absence." - Samuel L. Jackson.