So you'd prefer staff only voting?

^That, or we just weed out the shitty members of the FVC...

Staff members aren't necessarily the best voters, hell, most of them are sub-par at best. The FVC have been chosen because of their voting talents, one sour apple in the basket doesn't make the basket bad.

Staff and FVC votes.. Also if heavyweights wanted to vote they can.. And also regular battle format..

The likelihood is that cash battles, if introduced to the site, would be competed in the exclusive section, with voters from a selected panel.

One bad apple sours the bunch.

Yeah, horrid analogy on my part. But in this context, the bad apples in the FVC just make us look bad, which is why they need to be weeded out.

@ILLoKWENT lol .... and yeah im down for cash tourneys.. people sign up, once the tourney is full a panel of the sites best voters goes up where only the tournament entrees can vote on who there judges are.. hell if you wanted to take it further you could make the members agree on judges or vote on judges, theres plenty of ways to do this just writing it off as another possible fail would be stupid af

Personally, I'd like to see a total of eight voters hand picked to vote on each battle. Take the best voters from the FVC & Staff teams to make up that 8, then you have eight individual, well-rounded voters providing in depth expositions & breakdowns as to why they believe the battler that they have chosen got the W.

I think present the voter options and have the contestants choose who they want voting on the battle out of the available names... thats one way.. another way too would be to make it anonymous ..ex.. baller 1 vs. Battler 2.. so that way bars are judged solely on bars and not preswayed based on name ...

^Good idea, but wouldn't work on audio lol.