Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums

Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Talk (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   King Titles (https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169513)

Esso 01-23-2020 11:34 PM

7 CONSECUTIVE defenses without no shows....same amount of total defenses as Illokwent....never lost the title. Staff took it before I got to 8.

If y’all ever stop bumbling the handling of this title to death and make a decision that there’s only gonna be one crown....I get the first crack at it.

The Saaxxx Baba 01-23-2020 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 1195754)
Can you all stop arguing 500 different points and just vote on the poll? Cheers.

LMAOOOOOOOO

Malishus 01-24-2020 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rieper (Post 1195845)
You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

Edgeworth 01-24-2020 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malishus (Post 1195853)
uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.

EtH 01-24-2020 09:13 AM

Yeah, the battle was agreed upon so dunno what this lads talking about.

Regardless, he has a hissy fit over not having the requirements but now backs out when he gets to take it away? If you were gonna get cold feet kid you shouldn't have been bitching about which account to use.

No one cares that you beat Daddio if on the other account dudes like EtH are walking through you. Your account is irrelevant

Malishus 01-24-2020 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 1195893)
Yeah, the battle was agreed upon so dunno what this lads talking about.

Regardless, he has a hissy fit over not having the requirements but now backs out when he gets to take it away? If you were gonna get cold feet kid you shouldn't have been bitching about which account to use.

No one cares that you beat Daddio if on the other account dudes like EtH are walking through you. Your account is irrelevant

haha, keep up that work eth.i see what your doing..

EtH 01-24-2020 10:38 AM

I dont see what you're doing

Malishus 01-24-2020 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH (Post 1195898)
I dont see what you're doing

open your mind quaid.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.