You mean where I deleted his CLEAR hate vote on the battle between Punk vs Muggz where he tries to say "THIS IS NOT A HATE VOTE" in his opening sentence?

I remember BORO running to the forums and crying about it THREATENING to have me demodded over it. Matter of fact, that's what most people truly remember is that BORO felt he was protected and that he had people higher up than me in his back pocket.
@Punk to fact-check.

You don't understand the situation, but I just told you what it was. All good, man.

[/COLOR]i don't think you're doing a shit job, i dont think i've said that, but i do think treating LB as a court of law is retarded. we aren't a police force, with access to the law, and tolls required to find the truth. all we can do is follow the logic and make the ethical choice. in ricans case?

well, sometimes a weed is just a weed and you cut it.

That mindset is a slippery slope.

https://www.letsbeef.com/battle_deta...n=lb&id=679503

Yeah I’m still salty over that. the amount of old heads that voted against me almost got battles themselves.

Boro and I are cool now though.

All I've preached in here was to ban multis, as they are the root cause to everything related to cheating. That's all, please give this some consideration - peace.

i really agree with you. it can lead to witch hunts, and big mistakes. but with rican? there is honestly no way it could be anything else.

The lawyer shit legit makes no sense. Hey look we have mods again. How was the legal training to get the role? Moderators exist on every forum site ever made.

I reckon the whole site turned on Pugz and his decisions and X had to demod everyone rather than just his bro.

But how do you address the situation where Aggo fed Rican some specific information and within minutes Hawtlanta had a thread up about it. Can say we want “concrete proof” but what does that mean? Do we literally need a video recording of Rican logging into Hawtlanta/swiftkeys and writing the posts? Like cmon man. It’s so painfully obvious