Can we make it a rule that white people cant have black people as their avatars? Quite frankly its misleading. Willing to make an exception for LL Cool J avatars. Only a white person would rock that anyway.

Technically im only 1/2 - 1/3 white so if we're doing that we gotta set a percentage limit ... how white is too white for a Lil wayne Avatar?


I'lll look up my ancestry and get back to u with the exact numbers


:rolleyes:

i'm not trying to be unfair to eth, because he's kind of become a beloved part of the community, and he's helped me learn a lot of things, but basically the argument y'all are presenting for this is "who tf cares about hof, don't be a nerd, the sites dying anyways"

No its not. Go read my first response.

The argument here is the HOF shouldn't only be for battling. But for those who's created the biggest most valued impacts on LB.

Thats the argument. Hopefully no ones confused by what's going on in this thread because that's legit the argument.

"The argument here is the HOF shouldn't only be for battling. But for those who's created the biggest most valued impacts on LB."

the text, track, crew, and audio categories are all irrelevant to this description. if you're talking about creating a new sub section for such a thing, i could see that, but eth still wouldn't belong. i feel like if eth never deleted or had his accounts deleted he'd be at like 3000 infraction points aka super perma banned. which would = no hof. that's just speculation, the other reason i'd say no is because infamy doesn't equate to hof. we all know LT was a coke sniffing, teenage fucking loser, who played dirty, but that's not why he made hof. everyone knows aaron Hernandez but he's not getting hof for being one of the infamous people involved with the nfl, and i don't mean to compare eth so harshly, i'm just pointing out that troublemaking and trolling doesn't equate to 'site impact'

So you didn't read my first post in this thread. Lol

Either way, looks like he won't be HOF so there's no point in everyone crying about if he did become HOF. No one thats saying "No" has a solid reason why he shouldn't be beside "he ain't done enough". And it's all the guys who just started using LB again LOL

Regardless, if you keep skipping my first post and just responding, I'm just not gonna read anything else you type because its just based off of shit he's done to you and only you.

People can't even have fun on the site anymore without you guys using it against them when they're being praised for something. Sadly, if EtH was to leave the site, shit would be a ghost town. Dust rolling like dice.

Theres more legends and vets saying Yes and basic members who just came back to LB saying no

i mean, i'm trying to think outside of my history with when i'm considering him for hof, and i have the same issue i do with denrio b milk. sure he took out some good battlers a few times, but that doesn't make you hof. also i do think quantity is somewhat important for hof. how many good battles does eth have? i've been back for awhile and i've seen less than five. all time? is there even a way to know? with all the deletions? i think he's hurt himself by deleting so often.

Youre still talking about battles.... lol

I'm leaving this thread.

Come the fuck on. As someone who gave me bullshit infractions, dont even fucking start the infraction nonsense. You KNOW the infraction you gave me was bullshit. So much so that you blamed Pugz for it. Now I've been clear in my opposition in this thread but let's not front like this stance isn't ridiculous. If you can show me a rule I broke then cool.

There isn’t a Hall Of Fame anywhere that doesn’t include key contributors, media, managers, commissioners, etc. If you only include battlers, you’re ignoring everything else that went into making this place what it’s been over the years.

So what if it ain’t the same way it’s always been done? There’s a lot around here that could change for the better. The hall of fame ain’t no different.