quit frontin...when i showed u mine and HVK's verse u said a 9 lol...still though...you actin like 8's are super whack. No one deserves a 10 here nowadays imo

Agreed, ratings are an issue too

Anonyme you aren't nice at all.... just sayin.

yea imma go cry...

cuz ur a super duper dope lmfao...stop it there

---------- Post added at 11:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 PM ----------

http://www.letsbeef.com/tournament_b...863&section=lb

*reads ticket's battle comment*....my bad you were right

Im saying tho.

I could carry on but I've made my point loud n clear . Shit is dead.

Doesn't that defeat the previous remarks of 'people only vote on the dope battles but ignore the not-so-good battles'? you're the head text mod, you of all people should be back up either ticket or just c's idea and not be saying it's our own faults we don't get votes because our battles are wack.

To decide if a battle isn't very good or not, you have to read it first. If you've already read it why not vote?........ so sort of an invalid point. Respect you both but thats a bit of a stupid thing to say, a person has to read the battle before they can label it good or bad

---------- Post added at 10:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 PM ----------

@RULE @Krhyme SAVES

dont be crazy...its illogical to think that a whack battle should get 10 votes...

write to add to the site and to get good votes and buzz going and the votes will come.

Couldnt agree more on your first points, realistic ratings are a massive problems, i know me and @Phroxen are trying to get people to be more realistic with that. What i meant was... you can't say people need to write better to get people to vote, surely you have to have read the battle to determine whether it wasn't very good? by that time you may as well vote.

See my point?

There are just too many battles, higher premiums for battles = more voting, less battles and higher quality battles.