Sub & Cel DQ

[Autograph]

Since we are on the subject of controversy.

I think Sub & Cel should be DQ’ed from the tag tourney because Sub wrote their entire verse in the first round of the tourney.

https://www.letsbeef.com/tournament_...543&section=tb

It’s suppose to be a Tag Team battle. They didn’t follow the “scheme”. I was DQ’ed from the Audio Scheme Tourney for not following the “Scheme”. Is this a reach? I genuinely don’t think so.

[Autograph]

Since we are on the subject of controversy.

I think Sub & Cel should be DQ’ed from the tag tourney because Sub wrote their entire verse in the first round of the tourney.

https://www.letsbeef.com/tournament_...543&section=tb

It’s suppose to be a Tag Team battle. They didn’t follow the “scheme”. I was DQ’ed from the Audio Scheme Tourney for not following the “Scheme”. Is this a reach? I genuinely don’t think so.

Where did Sub admit to this?

Where did Sub admit to this?

[Autograph]

@Rieper in chat I believe. I’d have to dig through the archives to find it. And it was Cel that admitted to Sub writing it all.

This was brought to the attention of everyone in chat that day, including RULE, and it was over looked.

[Autograph]

@Rieper in chat I believe. I’d have to dig through the archives to find it. And it was Cel that admitted to Sub writing it all.

This was brought to the attention of everyone in chat that day, including RULE, and it was over looked.

[RULE]

Nowhere does it state that both battlers must contribute lines (although it probably should).

If this were a constant occurance through the tourney i'd agree but on this occasion we'll give them the benefit of the doubt.

1/

[RULE]

Nowhere does it state that both battlers must contribute lines (although it probably should).

If this were a constant occurance through the tourney i'd agree but on this occasion we'll give them the benefit of the doubt.

1/