King Titles - Page 13 - Lets Beef

**Esso** · #**121** 01-23-2020, 11:34 PM

7 CONSECUTIVE defenses without no shows....same amount of total defenses as Illokwent....never lost the title. Staff took it before I got to 8.

If y’all ever stop bumbling the handling of this title to death and make a decision that there’s only gonna be one crown....I get the first crack at it.

**Esso** · 01-23-2020, 11:34 PM

7 CONSECUTIVE defenses without no shows....same amount of total defenses as Illokwent....never lost the title. Staff took it before I got to 8.

If y’all ever stop bumbling the handling of this title to death and make a decision that there’s only gonna be one crown....I get the first crack at it.

**The Saaxxx Baba** · #**122** 01-23-2020, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH

Can you all stop arguing 500 different points and just vote on the poll? Cheers.

LMAOOOOOOOO

**The Saaxxx Baba** · 01-23-2020, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH

Can you all stop arguing 500 different points and just vote on the poll? Cheers.

LMAOOOOOOOO

**Malishus** · #**123** 01-24-2020, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rieper

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

**Malishus** · 01-24-2020, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rieper

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

**Edgeworth** · #**124** 01-24-2020, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malishus

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.

**Edgeworth** · 01-24-2020, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malishus

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.

**EtH** · #**125** 01-24-2020, 09:13 AM

Yeah, the battle was agreed upon so dunno what this lads talking about.

Regardless, he has a hissy fit over not having the requirements but now backs out when he gets to take it away? If you were gonna get cold feet kid you shouldn't have been bitching about which account to use.

No one cares that you beat Daddio if on the other account dudes like EtH are walking through you. Your account is irrelevant

**EtH** · 01-24-2020, 09:13 AM

Yeah, the battle was agreed upon so dunno what this lads talking about.

Regardless, he has a hissy fit over not having the requirements but now backs out when he gets to take it away? If you were gonna get cold feet kid you shouldn't have been bitching about which account to use.

No one cares that you beat Daddio if on the other account dudes like EtH are walking through you. Your account is irrelevant

**Malishus** · #**126** 01-24-2020, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH

Yeah, the battle was agreed upon so dunno what this lads talking about.

Regardless, he has a hissy fit over not having the requirements but now backs out when he gets to take it away? If you were gonna get cold feet kid you shouldn't have been bitching about which account to use.

No one cares that you beat Daddio if on the other account dudes like EtH are walking through you. Your account is irrelevant

haha, keep up that work eth.i see what your doing..

**Malishus** · 01-24-2020, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EtH

Yeah, the battle was agreed upon so dunno what this lads talking about.

Regardless, he has a hissy fit over not having the requirements but now backs out when he gets to take it away? If you were gonna get cold feet kid you shouldn't have been bitching about which account to use.

No one cares that you beat Daddio if on the other account dudes like EtH are walking through you. Your account is irrelevant

haha, keep up that work eth.i see what your doing..