King Titles

[Edgeworth]

@EtH @RULE @Rai @Malishus @Seul @Esso

I think we need some more clarity around this King shit, and I don’t wanna see Rai get done dirty like it’s shaping up to be. There was recently a thread where the Kings discussed the king titles. All the kings records were laid out. I’m not sure if clear cut new rules were ever even established BUT It was a pretty general consensus that no current king would have their title revoked.

However, now we’ve got some bullshit going down in the LBT. Since Rai doesn’t have 7 consecutive DEFENCES of the LBT title, he’s gotta “earn” his title with a win over Illo and if he loses he loses the LBT king title. This goes against what was discussed before with current kings keeping their title. Now, if we’ve changed our minds and want to enforce the 7 consecutive defences as a hard criteria? Cool. But then it’s only fair to Rai, and all other LBT and LBA kings that RULE finishes off his run.

RULE
Battle Record:
Vs Phil Banks (52%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs UNKNOWN ARTIST (70%) - Lost the LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (No Show) - LBA Title Eliminator
Vs God The Reptillian (87%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs Rican (86%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (87%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Mister Jon Flako (100%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs GRizzEAT (71%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Guts (89%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

There’s only 5 successful consecutive defences there. If we’re making Rai put his title on the line against Illo, we’ve gotta atleast make RULE put it on the line against Seul, plus another defence. Then, we can dead the controversy once and for all around this topic and there doesn’t need to be any more of these bullshit threads (like this one).

[Edgeworth]

@EtH @RULE @Rai @Malishus @Seul @Esso

I think we need some more clarity around this King shit, and I don’t wanna see Rai get done dirty like it’s shaping up to be. There was recently a thread where the Kings discussed the king titles. All the kings records were laid out. I’m not sure if clear cut new rules were ever even established BUT It was a pretty general consensus that no current king would have their title revoked.

However, now we’ve got some bullshit going down in the LBT. Since Rai doesn’t have 7 consecutive DEFENCES of the LBT title, he’s gotta “earn” his title with a win over Illo and if he loses he loses the LBT king title. This goes against what was discussed before with current kings keeping their title. Now, if we’ve changed our minds and want to enforce the 7 consecutive defences as a hard criteria? Cool. But then it’s only fair to Rai, and all other LBT and LBA kings that RULE finishes off his run.

RULE
Battle Record:
Vs Phil Banks (52%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs UNKNOWN ARTIST (70%) - Lost the LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (No Show) - LBA Title Eliminator
Vs God The Reptillian (87%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs Rican (86%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (87%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Mister Jon Flako (100%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs GRizzEAT (71%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Guts (89%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

There’s only 5 successful consecutive defences there. If we’re making Rai put his title on the line against Illo, we’ve gotta atleast make RULE put it on the line against Seul, plus another defence. Then, we can dead the controversy once and for all around this topic and there doesn’t need to be any more of these bullshit threads (like this one).

The thing that throws a monkey wrench in to all of this is Rai actually agreeing to this, which idk why on Earth he would with the stipulations that were put in to place.

The thing that throws a monkey wrench in to all of this is Rai actually agreeing to this, which idk why on Earth he would with the stipulations that were put in to place.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

@EtH @RULE @Rai @Malishus @Seul @Esso

I think we need some more clarity around this King shit, and I don’t wanna see Rai get done dirty like it’s shaping up to be. There was recently a thread where the Kings discussed the king titles. All the kings records were laid out. I’m not sure if clear cut new rules were ever even established BUT It was a pretty general consensus that no current king would have their title revoked.

However, now we’ve got some bullshit going down in the LBT. Since Rai doesn’t have 7 consecutive DEFENCES of the LBT title, he’s gotta “earn” his title with a win over Illo and if he loses he loses the LBT king title. This goes against what was discussed before with current kings keeping their title. Now, if we’ve changed our minds and want to enforce the 7 consecutive defences as a hard criteria? Cool. But then it’s only fair to Rai, and all other LBT and LBA kings that RULE finishes off his run.

RULE
Battle Record:
Vs Phil Banks (52%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs UNKNOWN ARTIST (70%) - Lost the LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (No Show) - LBA Title Eliminator
Vs God The Reptillian (87%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs Rican (86%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (87%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Mister Jon Flako (100%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs GRizzEAT (71%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Guts (89%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

There’s only 5 successful consecutive defences there. If we’re making Rai put his title on the line against Illo, we’ve gotta atleast make RULE put it on the line against Seul, plus another defence. Then, we can dead the controversy once and for all around this topic and there doesn’t need to be any more of these bullshit threads (like this one).

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

@EtH @RULE @Rai @Malishus @Seul @Esso

I think we need some more clarity around this King shit, and I don’t wanna see Rai get done dirty like it’s shaping up to be. There was recently a thread where the Kings discussed the king titles. All the kings records were laid out. I’m not sure if clear cut new rules were ever even established BUT It was a pretty general consensus that no current king would have their title revoked.

However, now we’ve got some bullshit going down in the LBT. Since Rai doesn’t have 7 consecutive DEFENCES of the LBT title, he’s gotta “earn” his title with a win over Illo and if he loses he loses the LBT king title. This goes against what was discussed before with current kings keeping their title. Now, if we’ve changed our minds and want to enforce the 7 consecutive defences as a hard criteria? Cool. But then it’s only fair to Rai, and all other LBT and LBA kings that RULE finishes off his run.

RULE
Battle Record:
Vs Phil Banks (52%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs UNKNOWN ARTIST (70%) - Lost the LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (No Show) - LBA Title Eliminator
Vs God The Reptillian (87%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs Rican (86%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (87%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Mister Jon Flako (100%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs GRizzEAT (71%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Guts (89%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

There’s only 5 successful consecutive defences there. If we’re making Rai put his title on the line against Illo, we’ve gotta atleast make RULE put it on the line against Seul, plus another defence. Then, we can dead the controversy once and for all around this topic and there doesn’t need to be any more of these bullshit threads (like this one).

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

The rule was always consecutive so rule shouldn't even have the title off of that. Same with Rai and Seul

The rule was always consecutive so rule shouldn't even have the title off of that. Same with Rai and Seul

[EtH]

First, Rai had the complete decision. He wouldn't lose anything by saying no. He signed up to shut everyone up. He's sick of being called out and is confident he can out ILL in his place

I mentioned this potential battle in that thread. Rai was already down at that point but the only sticking point was ILLs account. Rai later said fuck it and accepted. Rai has completely not been forced into the defence, he's just being a gangster and wants to dead these threads.

As for RULEs point, no shows have always counted.

[EtH]

First, Rai had the complete decision. He wouldn't lose anything by saying no. He signed up to shut everyone up. He's sick of being called out and is confident he can out ILL in his place

I mentioned this potential battle in that thread. Rai was already down at that point but the only sticking point was ILLs account. Rai later said fuck it and accepted. Rai has completely not been forced into the defence, he's just being a gangster and wants to dead these threads.

As for RULEs point, no shows have always counted.

[Óðinn]

Wasn't aware that i No Showed vs RULE in the LBA...?

Anyway, yeah, i agree. If Rai has to go through this then so should others. It's only right.

[Óðinn]

Wasn't aware that i No Showed vs RULE in the LBA...?

Anyway, yeah, i agree. If Rai has to go through this then so should others. It's only right.

No shows shouldn't count. We don't credit people for no show wins anywhere else on the site, why do it with this?

No shows shouldn't count. We don't credit people for no show wins anywhere else on the site, why do it with this?

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

No shows shouldn't count. We don't credit people for no show wins anywhere else on the site, why do it with this?

Exactly they shouldnt.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

No shows shouldn't count. We don't credit people for no show wins anywhere else on the site, why do it with this?

Exactly they shouldnt.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by Noir

No shows shouldn't count. We don't credit people for no show wins anywhere else on the site, why do it with this?

Except literally every GC in history?

Alright no shows dont count at all. So whos Esso battling in the second round of the GC guys?

[EtH]

Originally Posted by Noir

No shows shouldn't count. We don't credit people for no show wins anywhere else on the site, why do it with this?

Except literally every GC in history?

Alright no shows dont count at all. So whos Esso battling in the second round of the GC guys?

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

Just playing devils advocate here. If we wanna get technical like this, flako was a no show. Not to mention Seuls no shows were against people who signed up and made it to the LBA title match. Your defences are in an audio scheme tournament.

Again this is all detracting from the point though that I think it’s only fair. If everyone disagrees with me? That’s fine. But the thread had to be made

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

Just playing devils advocate here. If we wanna get technical like this, flako was a no show. Not to mention Seuls no shows were against people who signed up and made it to the LBA title match. Your defences are in an audio scheme tournament.

Again this is all detracting from the point though that I think it’s only fair. If everyone disagrees with me? That’s fine. But the thread had to be made