Yes you may request it... doesn't mean it will happen.
^This is my Original Point. There are two people in a battle. One doesn't reserve the right to dictate who votes and who doesn't on the battle...
Well it did in my battle with Concise as well has half the votes being deleted. That’s the whole reason I’m requesting it. And as for ur point above, the block feature does allow one person to do that, u being staff shouldn’t change that option.
Yes you may request it... doesn't mean it will happen.
^This is my Original Point. There are two people in a battle. One doesn't reserve the right to dictate who votes and who doesn't on the battle...
Well it did in my battle with Concise as well has half the votes being deleted. That’s the whole reason I’m requesting it. And as for ur point above, the block feature does allow one person to do that, u being staff shouldn’t change that option.
I got a 1.73¢,made 3$dollars twooday and bought some tobacco smoke with 2$dollars haha my bank account empty no credit cards i m freestyle the money,since young money
I got a 1.73¢,made 3$dollars twooday and bought some tobacco smoke with 2$dollars haha my bank account empty no credit cards i m freestyle the money,since young money
I'll add my 2 cents...
While I agree with the reasoning behind this (that there's no need to message people directly because you can do it publicly in forums, chatbox, or discord, and dm's have the potential to sway), I don't think it's a proper rule because it's practically unenforceable. How exactly are you going to prove that someone has pm'ed someone else for a vote? A screenshot that can be photoshopped? A forwarded PM that can be edited? Maybe I'm missing something, but as far as I know, the only staff members that can read PM's are superadmins (Pseudo and X). Access to reading arrowchat messages can be granted to any staff member, but it's probably not a good idea if they did so because of privacy issues that can raise. There are ways that an admin can enter someone's account and read their PM's, but they're not supposed to, and doing so can open the site to legal repercussions. If I were you guys, I'd stick to only making rules you can actually enforce properly because you have the tools and access to ascertain.
I'll add my 2 cents...
While I agree with the reasoning behind this (that there's no need to message people directly because you can do it publicly in forums, chatbox, or discord, and dm's have the potential to sway), I don't think it's a proper rule because it's practically unenforceable. How exactly are you going to prove that someone has pm'ed someone else for a vote? A screenshot that can be photoshopped? A forwarded PM that can be edited? Maybe I'm missing something, but as far as I know, the only staff members that can read PM's are superadmins (Pseudo and X). Access to reading arrowchat messages can be granted to any staff member, but it's probably not a good idea if they did so because of privacy issues that can raise. There are ways that an admin can enter someone's account and read their PM's, but they're not supposed to, and doing so can open the site to legal repercussions. If I were you guys, I'd stick to only making rules you can actually enforce properly because you have the tools and access to ascertain.
I'll add my 2 cents...
While I agree with the reasoning behind this (that there's no need to message people directly because you can do it publicly in forums, chatbox, or discord, and dm's have the potential to sway), I don't think it's a proper rule because it's practically unenforceable. How exactly are you going to prove that someone has pm'ed someone else for a vote? A screenshot that can be photoshopped? A forwarded PM that can be edited? Maybe I'm missing something, but as far as I know, the only staff members that can read PM's are superadmins (Pseudo and X). Access to reading arrowchat messages can be granted to any staff member, but it's probably not a good idea if they did so because of privacy issues that can raise. There are ways that an admin can enter someone's account and read their PM's, but they're not supposed to, and doing so can open the site to legal repercussions. If I were you guys, I'd stick to only making rules you can actually enforce properly because you have the tools and access to ascertain.
These are all really good points ngl. Tbh I'm not 100% sure how this rule would be properly enforced either. Until further notice, however, we'll try to enforce this rule anyhow unless a better resolution for this issue can be created.
I got a 1.73¢,made 3$dollars twooday and bought some tobacco smoke with 2$dollars haha my bank account empty no credit cards i m freestyle the money,since young money
I'll add my 2 cents...
While I agree with the reasoning behind this (that there's no need to message people directly because you can do it publicly in forums, chatbox, or discord, and dm's have the potential to sway), I don't think it's a proper rule because it's practically unenforceable. How exactly are you going to prove that someone has pm'ed someone else for a vote? A screenshot that can be photoshopped? A forwarded PM that can be edited? Maybe I'm missing something, but as far as I know, the only staff members that can read PM's are superadmins (Pseudo and X). Access to reading arrowchat messages can be granted to any staff member, but it's probably not a good idea if they did so because of privacy issues that can raise. There are ways that an admin can enter someone's account and read their PM's, but they're not supposed to, and doing so can open the site to legal repercussions. If I were you guys, I'd stick to only making rules you can actually enforce properly because you have the tools and access to ascertain.
These are all really good points ngl. Tbh I'm not 100% sure how this rule would be properly enforced either. Until further notice, however, we'll try to enforce this rule anyhow unless a better resolution for this issue can be created.
These are all really good points ngl. Tbh I'm not 100% sure how this rule would be properly enforced either. Until further notice, however, we'll try to enforce this rule anyhow unless a better resolution for this issue can be created.
These are all really good points ngl. Tbh I'm not 100% sure how this rule would be properly enforced either. Until further notice, however, we'll try to enforce this rule anyhow unless a better resolution for this issue can be created.
I got a 1.73¢,made 3$dollars twooday and bought some tobacco smoke with 2$dollars haha my bank account empty no credit cards i m freestyle the money,since young money
I got a 1.73¢,made 3$dollars twooday and bought some tobacco smoke with 2$dollars haha my bank account empty no credit cards i m freestyle the money,since young money
I get the sentiment behind this, obvi this isn't exactly enforceable @NOBLE but I think of it more like a PSA:
Don't be sneaky bitches and vote for your "friends" n shit, just vote for who had the better verse, easy enough.
I feel like the MAJORITY of y'all do but there's a few who drop vague expos and have a pattern, those are who this is for, you're not that slick and this isn't that serious, you've been warned.
I get the sentiment behind this, obvi this isn't exactly enforceable @NOBLE but I think of it more like a PSA:
Don't be sneaky bitches and vote for your "friends" n shit, just vote for who had the better verse, easy enough.
I feel like the MAJORITY of y'all do but there's a few who drop vague expos and have a pattern, those are who this is for, you're not that slick and this isn't that serious, you've been warned.
I get the sentiment behind this, obvi this isn't exactly enforceable @NOBLE but I think of it more like a PSA:
Don't be sneaky bitches and vote for your "friends" n shit, just vote for who had the better verse, easy enough.
I feel like the MAJORITY of y'all do but there's a few who drop vague expos and have a pattern, those are who this is for, you're not that slick and this isn't that serious, you've been warned.
I get the sentiment behind this, obvi this isn't exactly enforceable @NOBLE but I think of it more like a PSA:
Don't be sneaky bitches and vote for your "friends" n shit, just vote for who had the better verse, easy enough.
I feel like the MAJORITY of y'all do but there's a few who drop vague expos and have a pattern, those are who this is for, you're not that slick and this isn't that serious, you've been warned.
AUDIO
TEXT
Battle Feed
Linear Mode
