King Titles

Originally Posted by BizzyOne

Lol...I actually practice alot. I just dont post audio battles as often, but what really started to piss me off was the voting system in text. Mfer on here be sayin stupid shit lol.

Lol you caught on early huh

Originally Posted by BizzyOne

Lol...I actually practice alot. I just dont post audio battles as often, but what really started to piss me off was the voting system in text. Mfer on here be sayin stupid shit lol.

Lol you caught on early huh

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

You ain't an audio heavyweight my friend, but how about you and me battle 2 min audio acapella for the LBA King title?

Sounds good. You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up for my Bizzy rematch.

Still doesnt solve the ACTUAL issue of what the criteria should be lol

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

You ain't an audio heavyweight my friend, but how about you and me battle 2 min audio acapella for the LBA King title?

Sounds good. You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up for my Bizzy rematch.

Still doesnt solve the ACTUAL issue of what the criteria should be lol

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up

[Seul]

I don't care what the criteria is, y'all flip-flopping every other day so come up to your own conclusions.

[Seul]

I don't care what the criteria is, y'all flip-flopping every other day so come up to your own conclusions.

[Student]

Originally Posted by RULE

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

So off my whole post that's the only part you respond to?

[Student]

Originally Posted by RULE

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

So off my whole post that's the only part you respond to?

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Illo had 10 consec defences.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Illo had 10 consec defences.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

I'm not counting no-shows, nor should anyone else.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

I'm not counting no-shows, nor should anyone else.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

2 of them were no-shows.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

2 of them were no-shows.

[Seul]

Aren't the titles abolished?

[Seul]

Aren't the titles abolished?