Troll battles to qualify for the GC

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

bud, you are on the FVC and on the site for more than 6hrs so I am sure you can take a look around and drop your opinion on the battles this month.

But you did reply to my OP with ''What's it matter if they are allowed in? Do you not want more competition?'' without me explaining anything.


As a former mod and former mod candidate, do you condone that?

I condone activity. I consider troll or "spam verses" verses that clearly waste the time and effort of the writer that took their verse serious enough to post it in the first place. That's a troll or a spam verse, imo.

What I DON'T condone is biting in tournament battles. I also don't condone or buy that this is your attempt to "keep the integrity of the tournament in check", especially since you bit in your last tournament outing and got caught for it, so how much do you actually care about the integrity of the tourney you're in in the first place when you pull that?

You're also the person who made this thread, so whether or not I'm on here for 6 hours or 6 minutes, you should be the one explaining what you feel are the spam verses since YOU made this thread. Not me. You can't just pass the buck to me simply because of my activity.

You had no issue making threads regarding biting accusations when they clearly held zero merit, so why do you have a problem posting up what you consider "spam verses" all of a sudden?

Seems like you're reaching, imo.

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

bud, you are on the FVC and on the site for more than 6hrs so I am sure you can take a look around and drop your opinion on the battles this month.

But you did reply to my OP with ''What's it matter if they are allowed in? Do you not want more competition?'' without me explaining anything.


As a former mod and former mod candidate, do you condone that?

I condone activity. I consider troll or "spam verses" verses that clearly waste the time and effort of the writer that took their verse serious enough to post it in the first place. That's a troll or a spam verse, imo.

What I DON'T condone is biting in tournament battles. I also don't condone or buy that this is your attempt to "keep the integrity of the tournament in check", especially since you bit in your last tournament outing and got caught for it, so how much do you actually care about the integrity of the tourney you're in in the first place when you pull that?

You're also the person who made this thread, so whether or not I'm on here for 6 hours or 6 minutes, you should be the one explaining what you feel are the spam verses since YOU made this thread. Not me. You can't just pass the buck to me simply because of my activity.

You had no issue making threads regarding biting accusations when they clearly held zero merit, so why do you have a problem posting up what you consider "spam verses" all of a sudden?

Seems like you're reaching, imo.

[swiftkeys]

Hey buddy, the original post is about the troll verses this month. I am not talking about what you're talking about. (?)I just asked a question with a very peaceful approach.

You just wrote 5 paragraphs that are out of context (to this thread) and seem awfully contentious. Let's not make this about me or yourself. I am talking about the troll verses. Thanks for your opinion, though. Let's have someone else drop their 2 cents, in now.

Let's get back to the matter at hand.

[swiftkeys]

Hey buddy, the original post is about the troll verses this month. I am not talking about what you're talking about. (?)I just asked a question with a very peaceful approach.

You just wrote 5 paragraphs that are out of context (to this thread) and seem awfully contentious. Let's not make this about me or yourself. I am talking about the troll verses. Thanks for your opinion, though. Let's have someone else drop their 2 cents, in now.

Let's get back to the matter at hand.

[RULE]

I havent seen you link a spam verse, whats up.

Drop them links.

[RULE]

I havent seen you link a spam verse, whats up.

Drop them links.

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

Hey buddy, the original post is about the troll verses this month. I am not talking about what you're talking about. (?)

I just asked a question with a very peaceful approach.

You just wrote 5 paragraphs that are out of context (to this thread) and seem awfully contentious.

Let's not make this about me or yourself. I am talking about the troll verses.

Thanks for your opinion. Let's have someone else drop their 2 cents, in now.

You have still yet to bring up the troll verses you're referring to. If that's what this thread is about then bring them up.

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

Hey buddy, the original post is about the troll verses this month. I am not talking about what you're talking about. (?)

I just asked a question with a very peaceful approach.

You just wrote 5 paragraphs that are out of context (to this thread) and seem awfully contentious.

Let's not make this about me or yourself. I am talking about the troll verses.

Thanks for your opinion. Let's have someone else drop their 2 cents, in now.

You have still yet to bring up the troll verses you're referring to. If that's what this thread is about then bring them up.

[swiftkeys]

@RULE took care of it.

[swiftkeys]

@RULE took care of it.

[Óðinn]

Just for future reference. When making a thread such as this, be sure to provide the battle(s) link(s) necessary.

[Óðinn]

Just for future reference. When making a thread such as this, be sure to provide the battle(s) link(s) necessary.

i agree with this idea. the whole idea of qualifying is to be an acitve battler during the season. anything else is just spitting in the faces of those who were actually active.

the whole idea of this was to stop this standard of only showing up to LB for a title.

i agree with this idea. the whole idea of qualifying is to be an acitve battler during the season. anything else is just spitting in the faces of those who were actually active.

the whole idea of this was to stop this standard of only showing up to LB for a title.