anyone wondering about the trayvon martin case - Lets Beef

#11 03-31-2012, 01:16 PM

how so? the circumstantial evidence is that a 40 year old man with a pistol violating parole killed a 17 year old kid with no record and junk food after alleged "broken nose and assault" that left no sign of damage or traces of blood

circumstantial evidence = guilty

---------- Post added at 09:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 AM ----------

and don't get me wrong, im not accusing you of being racist. all im saying is your priorities don't line up in this conversation

03-31-2012, 01:16 PM

how so? the circumstantial evidence is that a 40 year old man with a pistol violating parole killed a 17 year old kid with no record and junk food after alleged "broken nose and assault" that left no sign of damage or traces of blood

circumstantial evidence = guilty

---------- Post added at 09:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 AM ----------

and don't get me wrong, im not accusing you of being racist. all im saying is your priorities don't line up in this conversation


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!


	Grand Championship 2025 Battles ready for vote Phracture vs HuNgReeDy BeAsT Vote on tournaments to earn +5 credits!


	Battle Feed No battles yet.