A QUESTION ABOUT VOTING.

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by HVK

NO MATTER HOW HORRIBLE THA FLOW IS?

If it's really shit and horrible I'll knock off points, but I focus more on the actual content

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by HVK

NO MATTER HOW HORRIBLE THA FLOW IS?

If it's really shit and horrible I'll knock off points, but I focus more on the actual content

[HVK]

Originally Posted by The Young Prince

If it's really shit and horrible I'll knock off points, but I focus more on the actual content

I LIKE THAT METHOD ALOT ACTUALLY DUDE, THANKS FOR THAT INPUT.

[HVK]

Originally Posted by The Young Prince

If it's really shit and horrible I'll knock off points, but I focus more on the actual content

I LIKE THAT METHOD ALOT ACTUALLY DUDE, THANKS FOR THAT INPUT.

here's what i look for in this order.

1.punches. did i like the punches?
2. execution. flow and performance come in here. for text this is more about wording and logic.
3. creativity
4. skill (wordplay, metaphors, and so on)
5. multi strength

here are the things i mark in a battle and in what order.

1. punches. (they didn't throw any, or had simple/broken punches)
2. wording mistakes, logic mistakes, bad wordplay
3. (for audio here is where i mark someone down for a boring performance)

here's the bottom line though. and a good example. edge vs guts first round, edge wasn't too hot on the mic, and guts was clearly more comfortable, but edge had stronger bars with better logic and flow. my vote? edgeworth no doubt. however, if i was battling someone and you could barely hear their audio, it sounded like they were talking, and kept repeating lines they fucked up, then it isn't even rap. auto loss. so yeah, obviously if someone bombs, it doesn't even count, but i think i've made how i view it clear.

here's what i look for in this order.

1.punches. did i like the punches?
2. execution. flow and performance come in here. for text this is more about wording and logic.
3. creativity
4. skill (wordplay, metaphors, and so on)
5. multi strength

here are the things i mark in a battle and in what order.

1. punches. (they didn't throw any, or had simple/broken punches)
2. wording mistakes, logic mistakes, bad wordplay
3. (for audio here is where i mark someone down for a boring performance)

here's the bottom line though. and a good example. edge vs guts first round, edge wasn't too hot on the mic, and guts was clearly more comfortable, but edge had stronger bars with better logic and flow. my vote? edgeworth no doubt. however, if i was battling someone and you could barely hear their audio, it sounded like they were talking, and kept repeating lines they fucked up, then it isn't even rap. auto loss. so yeah, obviously if someone bombs, it doesn't even count, but i think i've made how i view it clear.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by g u t s

broken punches

What the fuck is a broken punch? Lmao

[EtH]

Originally Posted by g u t s

broken punches

What the fuck is a broken punch? Lmao

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

What the fuck is a broken punch? Lmao

your life?

but in all honesty, i mean a punch with failed logic, or a punch were they clearly stretched the concept to a point of the punch not working.

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

What the fuck is a broken punch? Lmao

your life?

but in all honesty, i mean a punch with failed logic, or a punch were they clearly stretched the concept to a point of the punch not working.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by g u t s

your life?

but in all honesty, i mean a punch with failed logic, or a punch were they clearly stretched the concept to a point of the punch not working.

Sick burn bro

But in all honesty, no one says "broken punches" and you're clearly just trying to fit in by forcing the "lingo".

[EtH]

Originally Posted by g u t s

your life?

but in all honesty, i mean a punch with failed logic, or a punch were they clearly stretched the concept to a point of the punch not working.

Sick burn bro

But in all honesty, no one says "broken punches" and you're clearly just trying to fit in by forcing the "lingo".

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

Sick burn bro

But in all honesty, no one says "broken punches" and you're clearly just trying to fit in by forcing the "lingo".

because you're a battle expert? you're garbage. and if you talk delivery, nobody can understand a single word you utter, you filthy scott. .

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

Sick burn bro

But in all honesty, no one says "broken punches" and you're clearly just trying to fit in by forcing the "lingo".

because you're a battle expert? you're garbage. and if you talk delivery, nobody can understand a single word you utter, you filthy scott. .

[HVK]

Originally Posted by g u t s

here's what i look for in this order.

1.punches. did i like the punches?
2. execution. flow and performance come in here. for text this is more about wording and logic.
3. creativity
4. skill (wordplay, metaphors, and so on)
5. multi strength

here are the things i mark in a battle and in what order.

1. punches. (they didn't throw any, or had simple/broken punches)
2. wording mistakes, logic mistakes, bad wordplay
3. (for audio here is where i mark someone down for a boring performance)

here's the bottom line though. and a good example. edge vs guts first round, edge wasn't too hot on the mic, and guts was clearly more comfortable, but edge had stronger bars with better logic and flow. my vote? edgeworth no doubt. however, if i was battling someone and you could barely hear their audio, it sounded like they were talking, and kept repeating lines they fucked up, then it isn't even rap. auto loss. so yeah, obviously if someone bombs, it doesn't even count, but i think i've made how i view it clear.

GOOD EXPLANATION, THATS QUITE A PROCESS YOU GO THROUGH EACH VOTE DUDE LOL. THANKS FOR THAT THOUGH, THAT LAYOUT COULD ACTUALLY HELP SOME NEWER GUYS IF THEY HAVE THAT WAY OF THINKING..... NICE.

[HVK]

Originally Posted by g u t s

here's what i look for in this order.

1.punches. did i like the punches?
2. execution. flow and performance come in here. for text this is more about wording and logic.
3. creativity
4. skill (wordplay, metaphors, and so on)
5. multi strength

here are the things i mark in a battle and in what order.

1. punches. (they didn't throw any, or had simple/broken punches)
2. wording mistakes, logic mistakes, bad wordplay
3. (for audio here is where i mark someone down for a boring performance)

here's the bottom line though. and a good example. edge vs guts first round, edge wasn't too hot on the mic, and guts was clearly more comfortable, but edge had stronger bars with better logic and flow. my vote? edgeworth no doubt. however, if i was battling someone and you could barely hear their audio, it sounded like they were talking, and kept repeating lines they fucked up, then it isn't even rap. auto loss. so yeah, obviously if someone bombs, it doesn't even count, but i think i've made how i view it clear.

GOOD EXPLANATION, THATS QUITE A PROCESS YOU GO THROUGH EACH VOTE DUDE LOL. THANKS FOR THAT THOUGH, THAT LAYOUT COULD ACTUALLY HELP SOME NEWER GUYS IF THEY HAVE THAT WAY OF THINKING..... NICE.

[EtH]

The amount of shit talking in this thread.

If you say "bars over delivery" you're completely missing that it's a good bar BECAUSE of the delivery. You ever seen a comedian have a crowd in stitches even though he has zero stage presence? Nope. If you aren't able to deliver a punchline it doesn't matter how hard it was.

The ability to sound clear, deliver a punch well and flow in audio are the equivalent of wording in text. Without that, the punch isn't hard regardless.

[EtH]

The amount of shit talking in this thread.

If you say "bars over delivery" you're completely missing that it's a good bar BECAUSE of the delivery. You ever seen a comedian have a crowd in stitches even though he has zero stage presence? Nope. If you aren't able to deliver a punchline it doesn't matter how hard it was.

The ability to sound clear, deliver a punch well and flow in audio are the equivalent of wording in text. Without that, the punch isn't hard regardless.

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

The amount of shit talking in this thread.

If you say "bars over delivery" you're completely missing that it's a good bar BECAUSE of the delivery. You ever seen a comedian have a crowd in stitches even though he has zero stage presence? Nope. If you aren't able to deliver a punchline it doesn't matter how hard it was.

The ability to sound clear, deliver a punch well and flow in audio are the equivalent of wording in text. Without that, the punch isn't hard regardless.

Yes, but good delivery on its own isn't enough, you could be smooth as silk on the mic & still not make sense. They both go together but I still favour commenting on the concept and how you execute it.

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

The amount of shit talking in this thread.

If you say "bars over delivery" you're completely missing that it's a good bar BECAUSE of the delivery. You ever seen a comedian have a crowd in stitches even though he has zero stage presence? Nope. If you aren't able to deliver a punchline it doesn't matter how hard it was.

The ability to sound clear, deliver a punch well and flow in audio are the equivalent of wording in text. Without that, the punch isn't hard regardless.

Yes, but good delivery on its own isn't enough, you could be smooth as silk on the mic & still not make sense. They both go together but I still favour commenting on the concept and how you execute it.