View Single Post
  #3  
Unread 08-22-2012, 05:26 PM
NOBLE
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,088
Mentioned: 3617 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

I don't see why its necessary plus I can see it causing some problems in the future. If you've sent a battle to someone and they're taking forever to respond, you can always get a mod to delete it so you can re-use the bars elsewhere. I take requests all the time for stuff like this in the Delete Battles Thread.
The problem with giving an automatic L if they don't respond within a certain time is not everybody is on here everyday. Some people might be active, and then real life shit comes up and you don't see them on LB for a while. Should they receive an L because someone decides to send them a battle and they weren't even here to notice? Plus you'll probably have people taking advantage of that and sending battles to people that they know ain't been active since 2006. I would say NO. Its unnecessary and it would create complications.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2012, 05:26 PM   #3
 
NOBLE
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 407 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,088
Mentioned: 3617 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

I don't see why its necessary plus I can see it causing some problems in the future. If you've sent a battle to someone and they're taking forever to respond, you can always get a mod to delete it so you can re-use the bars elsewhere. I take requests all the time for stuff like this in the Delete Battles Thread.
The problem with giving an automatic L if they don't respond within a certain time is not everybody is on here everyday. Some people might be active, and then real life shit comes up and you don't see them on LB for a while. Should they receive an L because someone decides to send them a battle and they weren't even here to notice? Plus you'll probably have people taking advantage of that and sending battles to people that they know ain't been active since 2006. I would say NO. Its unnecessary and it would create complications.
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote