Quote:
Originally Posted by M-Rock
Don't think it would be fair to the handful of dudes that have dropped thousands of battles and earned their ranking to just reset everything
Maybe adding a separate skill ranking system, like you said, to give people a more realistic idea of what's what could work. Cause the top 10 on the front page can be very misleading if someone is visiting for the first time
|
Well thats what I was sayin...theres 2 ways to go about doin it
doing away with the other ranking system completely and wiping the leaderboards
or adding a seperate ranking system, keeping the current leaderboards, but having a 'tier based' rank to compliment the Top 100. I think that would appeal to the crowd that wants to climb the ranks and not drop 300 battles to get there. Basically people can't climb ranks on this site if they don't battle alot...you shouldn't be punished for not sniping 5 battles a day like a lot of these clowns do...you should be rewarded for dropping quality shit against quality opponents..even if that means 1 battle every 2-3 weeks.
TLDR: the ranking system we have now is too one dimensional and there needs to be another way to assess someone's talent/skill other than a ranking system based on the quantity of battles & the number of W's one piles up within that large quantity of battles they had to do.. so when a newcomer signs up, they might not be able to climb the traditional Top 100 leaderboard but they can progress in a tier based one