Originally Posted by Guts

i don't think there CAN be a king since there's so much to debate. what if illok had the best streak, but rai had tripple his wins. what if seuls battles were considered the hardest to win. so many factors. i'd reckon it's best as a title that changes hands, and maybe there should be an annual vote for whoever holds the lba/lbt king title.

Agree.

I never liked the idea of that title.

And it can't be compared to GC's because you get a whole month to write a verse for one opponent while we get 3 days in GC's

Originally Posted by Guts

i don't think there CAN be a king since there's so much to debate. what if illok had the best streak, but rai had tripple his wins. what if seuls battles were considered the hardest to win. so many factors. i'd reckon it's best as a title that changes hands, and maybe there should be an annual vote for whoever holds the lba/lbt king title.

Agree.

I never liked the idea of that title.

And it can't be compared to GC's because you get a whole month to write a verse for one opponent while we get 3 days in GC's