Thread: Should non-staff members be able to have 3+ VP?
View Single Post
  #17  
Unread 11-29-2017, 01:42 PM
lllllllllllll
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shodan View Post
If the only possible VPs are 2 and 0, that's functionally identical to the only possible VPs being 1 and 0.

Your suggestion is stupid though.
It’s not because if everyone’s voting power is all over the place, how is that even close to being fair? Are you thinking before you respond or do you just type?
Reply With Quote
Unread 11-29-2017, 01:42 PM   #17
 
lllllllllllll
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shodan View Post
If the only possible VPs are 2 and 0, that's functionally identical to the only possible VPs being 1 and 0.

Your suggestion is stupid though.
It’s not because if everyone’s voting power is all over the place, how is that even close to being fair? Are you thinking before you respond or do you just type?
 
Reply With Quote