View Single Post
  #11  
Unread 01-24-2023, 11:30 PM
Masked-Reaper Masked-Reaper is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!Masked-Reaper is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!
Grand Champion
2x Premier League Champion
Cypher Champion
Scheme Champion
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 635
Mentioned: 216 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
2 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.6/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.6/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
160 Won / 25 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick View Post
Telling people they can’t vote or blocking them from voting because “they always vote for you” is lame. Does that mean they get to go through all of your battles, see who votes for you every time, and also block them/tell them not to vote?

Nah, I don’t like the precedence that sets, and it’s a shady way to suppress/control the voting.

---------- Post added at 12:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:16 AM ----------



So why only block their votes against Phroxen? If they’re so shady to you wouldn’t you have rejected their votes for every round and not just the rounds you felt would be closer/more competitive?
Just for the record I’ve asked them not to vote on a few occasions before this.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-24-2023, 11:30 PM   #11
 
Masked-Reaper Masked-Reaper is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!Masked-Reaper is on FIRE! 10+ wins in a row!
Grand Champion
2x Premier League Champion
Cypher Champion
Scheme Champion
Estimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 9.13/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
2 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 9.13/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.6/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.6/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
160 Won / 25 Lost
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Voted: 34 audio / 259 text
Posts: 635
Mentioned: 216 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick View Post
Telling people they can’t vote or blocking them from voting because “they always vote for you” is lame. Does that mean they get to go through all of your battles, see who votes for you every time, and also block them/tell them not to vote?

Nah, I don’t like the precedence that sets, and it’s a shady way to suppress/control the voting.

---------- Post added at 12:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:16 AM ----------



So why only block their votes against Phroxen? If they’re so shady to you wouldn’t you have rejected their votes for every round and not just the rounds you felt would be closer/more competitive?
Just for the record I’ve asked them not to vote on a few occasions before this.
Offline  
Reply With Quote