Thread: @EtH
View Single Post
  #13  
Unread 02-12-2020, 02:18 PM
GOOD GRIEF
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 870
Mentioned: 550 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
34 Won / 10 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rieper View Post
Tbf, I'm all for having less tourneys at this point.
Says the guy with 18 titles LOL


I agree tho. Here’s the thing @EtH

I’d like to participate in LBT it’s just that as soon as a tourney pops up it becomes top priority. I mean even you if you win an LBT match it’s only 1 match. Ya still gotta wait till next month for a new one to get one step closer to the belt (plus god forbid you lose and have to start over at the bottom of the card). THEN you gotta win 3-4 more matches for a shot... It’s a monthly event and almost half a year long ladder. That’s the ONLY thing I don’t like about the LBT. At least with tourneys as soon as you win you advance to the next one immediately. I know that this is a good system because it’s modeled after boxing PPVs and is exciting but Here’s my solution...

If we had more space in between tourneys we could have LBT events more often (maybe once a month for champion bouts but 2-3 times a month for undercards/ main card matches.) THEN, we could have LBT matches weigh more than regular matches in the site seasonal rankings which would provide incentive if the battle is high quality instead of just sniping 8s for ranking. @RULE @Autograph @Rai mod opinion?

P.S. Eth... if it makes you feel any better, voting wise this was the most pathetic GC I’ve seen. CRAZY caliber battles just getting slept across the board.

Last edited by GOOD GRIEF; 02-12-2020 at 02:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-12-2020, 02:18 PM   #13
 
GOOD GRIEF
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
34 Won / 10 Lost
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Voted: 8 audio / 155 text
Posts: 870
Mentioned: 550 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rieper View Post
Tbf, I'm all for having less tourneys at this point.
Says the guy with 18 titles LOL


I agree tho. Here’s the thing @EtH

I’d like to participate in LBT it’s just that as soon as a tourney pops up it becomes top priority. I mean even you if you win an LBT match it’s only 1 match. Ya still gotta wait till next month for a new one to get one step closer to the belt (plus god forbid you lose and have to start over at the bottom of the card). THEN you gotta win 3-4 more matches for a shot... It’s a monthly event and almost half a year long ladder. That’s the ONLY thing I don’t like about the LBT. At least with tourneys as soon as you win you advance to the next one immediately. I know that this is a good system because it’s modeled after boxing PPVs and is exciting but Here’s my solution...

If we had more space in between tourneys we could have LBT events more often (maybe once a month for champion bouts but 2-3 times a month for undercards/ main card matches.) THEN, we could have LBT matches weigh more than regular matches in the site seasonal rankings which would provide incentive if the battle is high quality instead of just sniping 8s for ranking. @RULE @Autograph @Rai mod opinion?

P.S. Eth... if it makes you feel any better, voting wise this was the most pathetic GC I’ve seen. CRAZY caliber battles just getting slept across the board.

Last edited by GOOD GRIEF; 02-12-2020 at 02:23 PM.
Offline  
Reply With Quote