View Single Post
  #18  
Unread 03-15-2016, 02:21 PM
ILLicitt
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
23 Won / 7 Lost
Default

The true goal of any HOF is to recognize someone for the work they've put in. It's widely known that there are some who get elected to the hall of fame off of pure skill, and then others who get elected because of their behind-the-scene contributions and tenure with the company/profession. It's about more than being able to "wow" you with a punchline. It's also about legacy (I.E. Sting being elected to the WWE HOF despite having only a few official WWE matches). If y'all are really going to be so anal over "let's beef patriarch" vs Hall of Famer then that's on y'all. But I think we all know Stu is well-deserving of a HOF spot.
__________________

Last edited by ILLicitt; 03-15-2016 at 02:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 03-15-2016, 02:21 PM   #18
 
ILLicitt
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.73/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
23 Won / 7 Lost
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Voted: 1 audio / 76 text
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)


Default

The true goal of any HOF is to recognize someone for the work they've put in. It's widely known that there are some who get elected to the hall of fame off of pure skill, and then others who get elected because of their behind-the-scene contributions and tenure with the company/profession. It's about more than being able to "wow" you with a punchline. It's also about legacy (I.E. Sting being elected to the WWE HOF despite having only a few official WWE matches). If y'all are really going to be so anal over "let's beef patriarch" vs Hall of Famer then that's on y'all. But I think we all know Stu is well-deserving of a HOF spot.
__________________

Last edited by ILLicitt; 03-15-2016 at 02:27 PM.
Offline  
Reply With Quote