The true goal of any HOF is to recognize someone for the work they've put in. It's widely known that there are some who get elected to the hall of fame off of pure skill, and then others who get elected because of their behind-the-scene contributions and tenure with the company/profession. It's about more than being able to "wow" you with a punchline. It's also about legacy (I.E. Sting being elected to the WWE HOF despite having only a few official WWE matches). If y'all are really going to be so anal over "let's beef patriarch" vs Hall of Famer then that's on y'all. But I think we all know Stu is well-deserving of a HOF spot.
Last edited by ILLicitt; 03-15-2016 at 02:27 PM.
|