Some of ya'll have lost your goddamn minds caring way too much about virtual accolades on a site that probably won't exist in 5 years
I'm here for it though. And again, inducting so-and-so doesnt take away from what other HOFers have accomplished. All of their titles are LITERALLY under their username. They'll look at someone like EtH in the HOF and see he has no titles, but truth be told EtH has had a bigger impact on the site than some dudes that have 1-2 titles.
---------- Post added at 12:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattan
Some of you keep on saying how it's a popularity contest. Keep on saying how easy it is to get into the HoF. You're clearly forgetting that RULE has been running the HoF and is extremely strict about who is let in/who isn't. Just because you're nominated doesn't guarantee you're inducted.
"The Hall Of Fame nomination polls are NOT a method for certain induction. The polls are used to gauge the sites feelings towards the nominee, and someone can easily score a 50-0 poll tally and still be rejected for induction. The poll is however a useful tool to see the general feelings of the sites members, and things such as crew/buddy voting as well as hate voting is clearly discernible due to the polls public nature.
Once a poll has reached a high number of votes either way, the Head of the Hall Of Fame: RULE, will then seek out the opinions of the sites most respected members before making a final verdict on whether or not the nominee in question has been successful."
I do want to know who these "most respected members" are that get the final say.
|
This.. I was voted into the HOF by a huge margin in my thread, and never got inducted.