View Single Post
  #25  
Unread 12-15-2017, 10:31 AM
EtH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindless View Post
>building the site in Java or C#

Okay, but those aren't really web browser languages. I mean, yeah, you CAN run Java in the browser but why would you?

Honestly, the best thing would be for someone to come in as an investor I think. Somebody that can put in the money and time to find additional programmers and pay for them to help X out with what is essentially a hobby.
I haven't learned php. Had I learned it, I'd be able to recreate it in as much time in that language. My point is that it's very easy to recreate the site. It's not complex.

Coding is all logic based, and it's very easy to logically break apart the battle system, ratings systems etc.

Why would someone invest in the site if some inactive guy with a negative history on the site remains the one in charge? The owner has no interest in profiting, but you think an investor would still be okay to put in money? What exactly is the "investment" there?
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-15-2017, 10:31 AM   #25
 
EtH
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindless View Post
>building the site in Java or C#

Okay, but those aren't really web browser languages. I mean, yeah, you CAN run Java in the browser but why would you?

Honestly, the best thing would be for someone to come in as an investor I think. Somebody that can put in the money and time to find additional programmers and pay for them to help X out with what is essentially a hobby.
I haven't learned php. Had I learned it, I'd be able to recreate it in as much time in that language. My point is that it's very easy to recreate the site. It's not complex.

Coding is all logic based, and it's very easy to logically break apart the battle system, ratings systems etc.

Why would someone invest in the site if some inactive guy with a negative history on the site remains the one in charge? The owner has no interest in profiting, but you think an investor would still be okay to put in money? What exactly is the "investment" there?
 
Reply With Quote