[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

But can you PROVE it was him during that final voting? Thats the real question.

And the answer is clearly no.

We have THINK its him and be 90% sure its him.

But i afford EVERYONE the same respect when if comes to infractions.

Regardless, this point should be moot now. As there all getting banned.

I mean he clearly has the access to the account. In that case you gotta always treat it like it’s the same person. Otherwise they can just always say it isn’t. Sharing accounts in the past can’t just be some infinite free pass for continued access to the others accounts. The fact you removed the votes was a good call in that respect though.

I think the proposed solution is good, in theory, but how can it really be enforced? I mean, it’s already gotten to the point where he was able to create Multis in the double digits

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

But can you PROVE it was him during that final voting? Thats the real question.

And the answer is clearly no.

We have THINK its him and be 90% sure its him.

But i afford EVERYONE the same respect when if comes to infractions.

Regardless, this point should be moot now. As there all getting banned.

I mean he clearly has the access to the account. In that case you gotta always treat it like it’s the same person. Otherwise they can just always say it isn’t. Sharing accounts in the past can’t just be some infinite free pass for continued access to the others accounts. The fact you removed the votes was a good call in that respect though.

I think the proposed solution is good, in theory, but how can it really be enforced? I mean, it’s already gotten to the point where he was able to create Multis in the double digits