Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

This idea works when you have 3 crews full of vets. But who makes up the crews now? Anbu is full of new guys. Apoc is full of new guys. ACs is mostly filled with relatively new guys. It's not like MFD where everyone was consolidated in one place.

A draft takes people who are typically "vets" and drafts members amongst the crews. Right now, you have let's just say for talking save that it's me and Lock running ACs from the "older head" perspective, Row and Punk in Anbu and HVK and X-Cal in Apoc. ACs has Malishus and Aggo as it's only other "old timey vets".

Outside of those crews, you have Rant, Shodan and maybe one or two more. What exactly is stopping you guys from making a proper crew? If you want to lead crews, go and do it. ACs, Anbu, Apoc and Red Ribbon are picking up new members to the site, and trying to build them up. We're not out there exclusively picking up veterans. You, Shodan and whoever else can pick up a brand new 1-0 member, build up a crew, and compete like the rest of us.

There aren't enough "vets" on the site for your argument to be valid. The crew numbers are inhibiting voting. That's what this primarily comes down to. They should be restricted because of it. If the number should already be restricted, why not use that restriction as an opportunity to build something new and fun for the site? This has nothing to do with "vets" or "noobs." It has to do with the sheer volume of members in crews, with the stagnating membership growth of the site.

Also, AC's is riddled with "vet" accounts, if we do go that direction. Not that I believe crew drafts are inherently linked to the number of vets in a crew. But, if it were, half of your crew are "vets."

Lockhart.
Aggo.
Malishus.
Eth.
Dirty Work.
M-Rock.
Dysfunctional.
Rai.
Peaceful.
Freek.
Enfinite.
Letum.

These are all "vet" accounts, in that they've been on the site for a long period of time, and have somewhat of a reputation adhered to their name. Mind you, some of these people are inactive. But, that doesn't change the fact that they're "vets." And subsequently add rationale to a draft from your own perspective.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

This idea works when you have 3 crews full of vets. But who makes up the crews now? Anbu is full of new guys. Apoc is full of new guys. ACs is mostly filled with relatively new guys. It's not like MFD where everyone was consolidated in one place.

A draft takes people who are typically "vets" and drafts members amongst the crews. Right now, you have let's just say for talking save that it's me and Lock running ACs from the "older head" perspective, Row and Punk in Anbu and HVK and X-Cal in Apoc. ACs has Malishus and Aggo as it's only other "old timey vets".

Outside of those crews, you have Rant, Shodan and maybe one or two more. What exactly is stopping you guys from making a proper crew? If you want to lead crews, go and do it. ACs, Anbu, Apoc and Red Ribbon are picking up new members to the site, and trying to build them up. We're not out there exclusively picking up veterans. You, Shodan and whoever else can pick up a brand new 1-0 member, build up a crew, and compete like the rest of us.

There aren't enough "vets" on the site for your argument to be valid. The crew numbers are inhibiting voting. That's what this primarily comes down to. They should be restricted because of it. If the number should already be restricted, why not use that restriction as an opportunity to build something new and fun for the site? This has nothing to do with "vets" or "noobs." It has to do with the sheer volume of members in crews, with the stagnating membership growth of the site.

Also, AC's is riddled with "vet" accounts, if we do go that direction. Not that I believe crew drafts are inherently linked to the number of vets in a crew. But, if it were, half of your crew are "vets."

Lockhart.
Aggo.
Malishus.
Eth.
Dirty Work.
M-Rock.
Dysfunctional.
Rai.
Peaceful.
Freek.
Enfinite.
Letum.

These are all "vet" accounts, in that they've been on the site for a long period of time, and have somewhat of a reputation adhered to their name. Mind you, some of these people are inactive. But, that doesn't change the fact that they're "vets." And subsequently add rationale to a draft from your own perspective.