View Single Post
  #18  
Unread 11-14-2017, 12:16 PM
Way Lyve
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 11 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
337 Won / 49 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
96 Won / 80 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant View Post
Thought predetermines action. If the thought is a motivating factor in an action, then the thought is just as affective as the actions itself. As, without the thought, the action would never have occurred.
The fault is with the thought. Not the object. The thought "I need to kill for g0d" is the motivation, not g0d.

Example: If you think a girl's beautiful and kill her man so you can have her you're to blame for the murder, not the girl. Regardless if you thought she was a goddess and wanted you to do it.

A fault in logic is the motivating factor. Action is a response. You can react to a haullenation but it wouldn't be the hallucination's fault. Just like if a scitzo killed someone he thought was being controlled by satan. It wouldn't actually be Satan's fault (technically) but the scitzo's, for his false belief.
Reply With Quote
Unread 11-14-2017, 12:16 PM   #18
 
Way Lyve
Estimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 8.01/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
337 Won / 49 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 8.01/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.46/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
96 Won / 80 Lost
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Voted: 892 audio / 229 text
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 149 Post(s)
Tagged: 11 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant View Post
Thought predetermines action. If the thought is a motivating factor in an action, then the thought is just as affective as the actions itself. As, without the thought, the action would never have occurred.
The fault is with the thought. Not the object. The thought "I need to kill for g0d" is the motivation, not g0d.

Example: If you think a girl's beautiful and kill her man so you can have her you're to blame for the murder, not the girl. Regardless if you thought she was a goddess and wanted you to do it.

A fault in logic is the motivating factor. Action is a response. You can react to a haullenation but it wouldn't be the hallucination's fault. Just like if a scitzo killed someone he thought was being controlled by satan. It wouldn't actually be Satan's fault (technically) but the scitzo's, for his false belief.
Offline  
Reply With Quote