Thread: Ok, so uhh..
View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 09-03-2022, 04:13 AM
Troubleshooter
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
12 Won / 1 Lost
Default Ok, so uhh..

I was thinking...this site should have like 4-6 main judges (preferably 3 audio, 3 text) who vote on every open battle on the site and still allow anyone to vote on them. This eliminates battles not closing at a reasonable time and people complaining about hate votes. Because this is where vp would come into play. Instead of starting everyone out with 2 vp we should be given 1 vp whereas the judges (along with the mods/admins) should have 3 vp. The judges votes would then easily outweigh the rest of the voters votes unless it's like a hot battle that's received a lot of votes. The voting for credits criteria doesn't need to change, but maybe offer more credits per battle voted on or offer like goals/milestones that grants users more credits once achieved (for example; vote 5 battles get 10 credits, and so forth). And it would be nothing like the FVC because these "judges" would be voting on every battle in the text/audio section (not just a few links here and there with a quota to meet). Make it like a job with no pay but benefits for them. Offer like emcee items/credits (or even a title). Plus, it would already make them well-regarded and fairly well-known just on voting every battle alone. How do y'all feel about this?

@Pugz @NOBLE
__________________
War is the continuation of politics by other means
Carl von Clausewitz
Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2022, 04:13 AM   #1
 
Troubleshooter
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.29/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
12 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Voted: 0 audio / 11 text
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default Ok, so uhh..

I was thinking...this site should have like 4-6 main judges (preferably 3 audio, 3 text) who vote on every open battle on the site and still allow anyone to vote on them. This eliminates battles not closing at a reasonable time and people complaining about hate votes. Because this is where vp would come into play. Instead of starting everyone out with 2 vp we should be given 1 vp whereas the judges (along with the mods/admins) should have 3 vp. The judges votes would then easily outweigh the rest of the voters votes unless it's like a hot battle that's received a lot of votes. The voting for credits criteria doesn't need to change, but maybe offer more credits per battle voted on or offer like goals/milestones that grants users more credits once achieved (for example; vote 5 battles get 10 credits, and so forth). And it would be nothing like the FVC because these "judges" would be voting on every battle in the text/audio section (not just a few links here and there with a quota to meet). Make it like a job with no pay but benefits for them. Offer like emcee items/credits (or even a title). Plus, it would already make them well-regarded and fairly well-known just on voting every battle alone. How do y'all feel about this?

@Pugz @NOBLE
__________________
War is the continuation of politics by other means
Carl von Clausewitz
Offline  
Reply With Quote