View Single Post
  #6  
Unread 12-11-2019, 01:16 PM
NOBLE
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,088
Mentioned: 3617 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

I agree that the forums/chatbox make the site more exciting and help to set up battle events, but this isn't suggesting to get rid of them period so much as to make a minimal prerequisite one must pass before continuing to the forum part of the site. It'll be like this: you log into LB and a message pops up saying x amount of votes is required to access the forum features of the site, but you can still battle, vote or drop tracks with no problem in the meantime. It can be a minimal amount of votes (like 5) so its not too much of a burden, and the access can last for a few days. You can still check the forums, just after dropping a few votes and you won't have to do so again for a few days. If everyone who logs in was required to do that, i can almost guarantee that will get rid of the voting problem. As far as people dropping shitty votes, people drop shitty votes now even without having this idea in place. There's always a probability that there will be Some shitty votes. Would you rather have more votes total with the probability that some will be shitty, or would you rather have less votes also with the probability that some will be shitty?
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-11-2019, 01:16 PM   #6
 
NOBLE
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 407 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,088
Mentioned: 3617 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

I agree that the forums/chatbox make the site more exciting and help to set up battle events, but this isn't suggesting to get rid of them period so much as to make a minimal prerequisite one must pass before continuing to the forum part of the site. It'll be like this: you log into LB and a message pops up saying x amount of votes is required to access the forum features of the site, but you can still battle, vote or drop tracks with no problem in the meantime. It can be a minimal amount of votes (like 5) so its not too much of a burden, and the access can last for a few days. You can still check the forums, just after dropping a few votes and you won't have to do so again for a few days. If everyone who logs in was required to do that, i can almost guarantee that will get rid of the voting problem. As far as people dropping shitty votes, people drop shitty votes now even without having this idea in place. There's always a probability that there will be Some shitty votes. Would you rather have more votes total with the probability that some will be shitty, or would you rather have less votes also with the probability that some will be shitty?
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote