[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Schematix

but yet they have issued gc titles due to no shows etc?but wont issue you something of lesser value?the battle was set you sent he hasnt replied that is grounds for a dq and the title should be awarded to you...open and shut case

Agree here @NOBLE. If that particular title is interchangeable upon the result of the title match. If lock was to noshow.. then dizz would remain a champion if im not mistaken.. so wit that logic since lock sent and dizz noshowed doesnt that constitute a forfeit of title to the challenger... or is there a rule that everyone needs know that in this type of interchangeable title. If the defending champ noshows, then the title becomes vacant?.which would mean that the challenger just wasted his bars once and would need to write another one in a top contender match?...... or is there simply no title for exclusive text king.. and lock is only entitled to the crown sig....curious on the ruling for this to clarify for lock.

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Schematix

but yet they have issued gc titles due to no shows etc?but wont issue you something of lesser value?the battle was set you sent he hasnt replied that is grounds for a dq and the title should be awarded to you...open and shut case

Agree here @NOBLE. If that particular title is interchangeable upon the result of the title match. If lock was to noshow.. then dizz would remain a champion if im not mistaken.. so wit that logic since lock sent and dizz noshowed doesnt that constitute a forfeit of title to the challenger... or is there a rule that everyone needs know that in this type of interchangeable title. If the defending champ noshows, then the title becomes vacant?.which would mean that the challenger just wasted his bars once and would need to write another one in a top contender match?...... or is there simply no title for exclusive text king.. and lock is only entitled to the crown sig....curious on the ruling for this to clarify for lock.