Thread: Atheism
View Single Post
  #39  
Unread 10-01-2013, 11:03 AM
NOBLE
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,104
Mentioned: 3632 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholas View Post
No, it doesn't. There is an elephant's head sticking out of your mum's vagina.... Oh there isn't? Prove it? Oh you can't?..... Well I guess there is then.
Bro, any statement about reality has the burden of proof. It doesn't matter if its worded positively as in "something is" or negatively as in "something isn't." By your logic, if I say 2 + 2 does not equal 4, I shouldn't have the burden of proving that because I stated it negatively? If no one has ever taught me or shown me proof that 2 + 2 equals 4, that mean I can make the absolute statement that 2 + 2 DOES NOT equal 4 and I'm immune to having to prove that claim on reality due to lack of proof of the contrary?
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 10-01-2013, 11:03 AM   #39
 
NOBLE
Hall Of Famer
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,104
Mentioned: 3632 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholas View Post
No, it doesn't. There is an elephant's head sticking out of your mum's vagina.... Oh there isn't? Prove it? Oh you can't?..... Well I guess there is then.
Bro, any statement about reality has the burden of proof. It doesn't matter if its worded positively as in "something is" or negatively as in "something isn't." By your logic, if I say 2 + 2 does not equal 4, I shouldn't have the burden of proving that because I stated it negatively? If no one has ever taught me or shown me proof that 2 + 2 equals 4, that mean I can make the absolute statement that 2 + 2 DOES NOT equal 4 and I'm immune to having to prove that claim on reality due to lack of proof of the contrary?
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote