Originally Posted by Louie Dawgs

How is social anarchy different from libertarian socialism?? I don't know that much about either.

If I'm not mistaken, social anarchy is a subset of libertarianism. But, the largest difference, is the libertarianists belief that private property should be divided as common public ground, and goods. Where as social anarchism is a belief which emphasizes communitarianism and social equality amongst all societal entities. IE: If /I/ have private property, /you/, in turn, have the right to private property yourself. If I, however, do not have said private property, then, under equality, you, also, should not be entitled to such.

Edit: Just re-read your post. Libertarian SOCIALISM is an interchangeable term with social anarchism.

Originally Posted by Louie Dawgs

How is social anarchy different from libertarian socialism?? I don't know that much about either.

If I'm not mistaken, social anarchy is a subset of libertarianism. But, the largest difference, is the libertarianists belief that private property should be divided as common public ground, and goods. Where as social anarchism is a belief which emphasizes communitarianism and social equality amongst all societal entities. IE: If /I/ have private property, /you/, in turn, have the right to private property yourself. If I, however, do not have said private property, then, under equality, you, also, should not be entitled to such.

Edit: Just re-read your post. Libertarian SOCIALISM is an interchangeable term with social anarchism.